Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Auto Parallel] Support Iterable dataset for auto parallel #45518

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Sep 7, 2022

Conversation

Caozhou1995
Copy link
Contributor

PR types

Others

PR changes

Others

Describe

Support Iterable dataset for auto parallel.

@paddle-bot
Copy link

paddle-bot bot commented Aug 29, 2022

你的PR提交成功,感谢你对开源项目的贡献!
请关注后续CI自动化测试结果,详情请参考Paddle-CI手册
Your PR has been submitted. Thanks for your contribution!
Please wait for the result of CI firstly. See Paddle CI Manual for details.

@Caozhou1995 Caozhou1995 force-pushed the engine_iterable_dataset branch 2 times, most recently from 37e4840 to 83e83b0 Compare August 29, 2022 12:15
@Caozhou1995 Caozhou1995 force-pushed the engine_iterable_dataset branch 3 times, most recently from 330fd3c to 8b1c928 Compare September 6, 2022 03:57
Copy link
Contributor

@XieYunshen XieYunshen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM for PROPERTIES LABELS "RUN_TYPE=EXCLUSIVE" TIMEOUT 80)

@JZ-LIANG JZ-LIANG merged commit b77fa1d into PaddlePaddle:develop Sep 7, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@JZ-LIANG JZ-LIANG left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Caozhou1995 added a commit to Caozhou1995/Paddle that referenced this pull request Sep 9, 2022
…dle#45518)

* support iterable dataset for auto parallel

* add split_data proto

* fix unittest bug

* fix recompute bug

* update cmake
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants