Enforce Pagination Limits on USER_LIST and ORGANIZATION_CONNECTION_LIST Queries #3173
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@sancheet230 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 26 minutes and 38 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces two new GraphQL query fields: Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client as Client
participant Resolver as GraphQL Resolver
participant Validator as Zod Validator
participant DB as drizzleClient
Client->>Resolver: Send query (organizationConnectionList or userList) with first and skip
Resolver->>Validator: Validate arguments using Zod schema
alt Validation succeeds
Validator-->>Resolver: Return validated parameters
Resolver->>DB: Execute query on organizationsTable/usersTable
DB-->>Resolver: Return results array
Resolver-->>Client: Return organization/user data
else Validation fails
Validator-->>Resolver: Return error details
Resolver-->>Client: Throw TalawaGraphQLError
end
Assessment against linked issues
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
|
@palisadoes You can review the changes I think everthing is fine |
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/graphql/types/Organization/organizationConnectionList.ts(1 hunks)src/graphql/types/User/userList.ts(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Actions: Pull request workflow
src/graphql/types/User/userList.ts
[warning] 6-6: Formatter would have printed the following content: first: z.number().min(1).max(100).default(10), skip: z.number().min(0).default(0),
src/graphql/types/Organization/organizationConnectionList.ts
[warning] 6-6: Formatter would have printed the following content: first: z.number().min(1).max(100).default(10), skip: z.number().min(0).default(0),
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/graphql/types/User/userList.ts (1)
11-48: LGTM! The implementation looks secure and follows best practices.The implementation correctly:
- Uses Zod for robust input validation
- Enforces pagination limits to prevent DoS attacks
- Provides clear error messages
- Uses proper typing with GraphQL builder
However, consider adding unit tests as mentioned in the PR description to ensure the pagination limits are properly enforced.
Would you like me to help generate comprehensive test cases for this implementation?
src/graphql/types/Organization/organizationConnectionList.ts (1)
6-9: Consider extracting shared pagination schema.This is a duplicate of the pagination schema in
userList.ts. Please refer to the previous comment about extracting this to a shared utility.🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Pull request workflow
[warning] 6-6: Formatter would have printed the following content: first: z.number().min(1).max(100).default(10), skip: z.number().min(0).default(0),
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/graphql/types/Organization/organizationConnectionList.ts(1 hunks)src/graphql/types/User/userList.ts(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Actions: Pull request workflow
src/graphql/types/User/userList.ts
[error] 5-5: Formatter would have printed the following content indicating formatting issues.
[error] 6-6: Some errors were emitted while running checks.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/graphql/types/User/userList.ts (4)
6-9: Extract shared pagination schema.The pagination schema is duplicated between
userList.tsandorganizationConnectionList.ts. Consider extracting it to maintain DRY principles.🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Pull request workflow
[error] 6-6: Some errors were emitted while running checks.
11-17: LGTM! Type-safe field definition.The GraphQL field definition is well-structured with proper typing and optional arguments.
18-35: LGTM! Robust error handling.The validation logic is well-implemented with detailed error messages that follow GraphQL best practices.
37-46: Consider cursor-based pagination for better scalability.While the current implementation is functional, offset-based pagination can have performance issues with large datasets. Consider implementing cursor-based pagination.
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
bugfix
Issue Number:
Fixes #3143
Snapshots/Videos:
NA
If relevant, did you update the documentation?
NA
Summary
This PR addresses issue [#3143] by enforcing pagination limits on the
firstandskipparameters for theUSER_LISTandORGANIZATION_CONNECTION_LISTGraphQL queries. This prevents clients from requesting excessively large datasets, which could lead to potential denial-of-service (DoS) attacks by overwhelming server resources.Checklist
CodeRabbit AI Review
Test Coverage
Other information
1.The changes have been manually tested to ensure they work as expected.
2.Test cases have not been added in this PR. It is recommended to add test cases to ensure the changes are thoroughly validated.
Have you read the contributing guide?
Yes
Summary by CodeRabbit