fix: Fetching more than 200 Azure DevOps issues #10073
Conversation
|
coderabbit, I'm sorry to have mentioned you. |
|
@coderabbitai review |
WalkthroughThe recent changes to the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant AzureDevOpsAPI
Client->>AzureDevOpsAPI: Request work items (batch of 200)
AzureDevOpsAPI-->>Client: Return work items
loop While more items
Client->>AzureDevOpsAPI: Request next batch of work items
AzureDevOpsAPI-->>Client: Return work items
end
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
@Dschoordsch, I've reviewed the changes made in the PR. The new implementation correctly handles fetching work items in batches of 200 to respect the API's limit. The error handling and mapping logic appear to be correctly implemented within the loop. Here are the key points:
Please ensure that the testing scenarios cover cases where:
If you have any specific scenarios or additional tests in mind, please include them in the testing checklist. Analysis chainScripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Fetch the diff of the PR to review the changes made.
gh pr diff 10073
Length of output: 1713 Actions performedReview triggered.
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (4)
packages/server/utils/AzureDevOpsServerManager.ts (4)
428-429: Avoid redundant comment.The comment on line 428 is redundant as the subsequent code already makes it clear that the function fetches at most 200 items at once.
- // we can fetch at most 200 items at once VS403474
Line range hint
474-475:
Ensure proper error handling and logging.Similar to the
getWorkItemDatafunction, consider logging the error for better debugging and monitoring.- if (!firstError) { - firstError = res - } + if (!firstError) { + firstError = res + console.error('Error executing WIQL query:', res) + }Tools
Biome
[error] 431-431: Avoid redundant double-negation.
It is not necessary to use double-negation when a value will already be coerced to a boolean.
Unsafe fix: Remove redundant double-negation(lint/complexity/noExtraBooleanCast)
Line range hint
528-531:
Ensure proper error handling and logging.Similar to previous functions, consider logging the error for better debugging and monitoring.
- if (!firstError) { - firstError = workItemsError - } + if (!firstError) { + firstError = workItemsError + console.error('Error fetching work items:', workItemsError) + }Tools
Biome
[error] 431-431: Avoid redundant double-negation.
It is not necessary to use double-negation when a value will already be coerced to a boolean.
Unsafe fix: Remove redundant double-negation(lint/complexity/noExtraBooleanCast)
Line range hint
604-605:
Ensure proper error handling and logging.Similar to previous functions, consider logging the error for better debugging and monitoring.
- if (!!accountProjectsError && !firstError) { - firstError = accountProjectsError + if (!!accountProjectsError) { + if (!firstError) { + firstError = accountProjectsError + } + console.error('Error fetching account projects:', accountProjectsError)Tools
Biome
[error] 431-431: Avoid redundant double-negation.
It is not necessary to use double-negation when a value will already be coerced to a boolean.
Unsafe fix: Remove redundant double-negation(lint/complexity/noExtraBooleanCast)
Description
Fixes/Partially Fixes #[issue number]
[Please include a summary of the changes and the related issue]
Demo
[If possible, please include a screenshot or gif/video, it'll make it easier for reviewers to understand the scope of the changes and how the change is supposed to work. If you're introducing something new or changing the existing patterns, please share a Loom and explain what decisions you've made and under what circumstances]
Testing scenarios
[Please list all the testing scenarios a reviewer has to check before approving the PR]
Scenario A
Scenario B
Final checklist
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes