Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add flow diagram to failed message details #1206

Merged
merged 28 commits into from
Jul 14, 2022
Merged

Conversation

WojcikMike
Copy link
Contributor

@WojcikMike WojcikMike commented Jun 17, 2022

Adds a new flow diagram tab inside the failed message details view. This provides ability to browse the entire conversation that contains the specific failed message. Check where did the message conversation stop, which messages may have triggered the failed message, as well as if there’s other failed messages in that conversation and the ability to directly navigate to their respective failed message details page.

@WojcikMike WojcikMike self-assigned this Jun 17, 2022
@WojcikMike
Copy link
Contributor Author

WojcikMike commented Jun 27, 2022

image

@sergioc sergioc added this to the 1.32.0 milestone Jul 12, 2022
@sergioc sergioc changed the title Adding initial flow diagram Add flow diagram to failed message details Jul 12, 2022
@WojcikMike WojcikMike marked this pull request as ready for review July 12, 2022 11:15
@WojcikMike WojcikMike requested review from cquirosj and sergioc July 12, 2022 11:15
@cquirosj cquirosj merged commit 190f7e9 into master Jul 14, 2022
@cquirosj cquirosj deleted the adding_flow_diagram branch July 14, 2022 04:11
@WojcikMike WojcikMike added the Type: Feature Type: Feature label Jul 14, 2022
WilliamBZA pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 17, 2023
* Adding initial flow diagram
Authored-by: WojcikMike
Co-authored-by: sergioc <sergioc@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Type: Feature Type: Feature
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants