-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 409
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
New Protocol NFS #366
New Protocol NFS #366
Conversation
Signed-off-by: termanix <50464194+termanix@users.noreply.github.com>
Added NFS Signed-off-by: termanix <50464194+termanix@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: termanix <50464194+termanix@users.noreply.github.com>
UID Brute Force added (To Do, Brute number will be taken by user) disconnection debug bug fixed To Do Kerberos Auth Signed-off-by: termanix <50464194+termanix@users.noreply.github.com>
Bruteforce-UID added. Kerberos auth left. Signed-off-by: termanix <50464194+termanix@users.noreply.github.com>
Crazy !!! 🎉🎉🎉 |
Signed-off-by: termanix <50464194+termanix@users.noreply.github.com>
Hell yeah! I’ve been wanting something like this for a while!!! |
Signed-off-by: termanix <50464194+termanix@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Signed-off-by: termanix <50464194+termanix@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: termanix <50464194+termanix@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: termanix <50464194+termanix@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: termanix <50464194+termanix@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: termanix <50464194+termanix@users.noreply.github.com>
To Do: Only left puf-file bug fixes for windows and linux. |
@termanix if you can verify the behaviour on your side we should be good to go 🚀 |
Signed-off-by: termanix <50464194+termanix@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: termanix <50464194+termanix@users.noreply.github.com>
@NeffIsBack On my side everything is fine now! It can be merge after your last review. 🚀 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Everything tested, we should be good 🚀
Excellent work from both of you @NeffIsBack @termanix ! 🎉 |
Lately I've been thinking about what NetExec needs in development and I thought seeing NFS shares would also help with development.
It's using RPC and enumerating NFS Shares and if accessible, it finds files recursively.
Together with @Marshall-Hallenbeck, we were able to bring it to its current state (Thank you Marshall for helping). I hope it will be a useful protocol for everyone.
Here it is some screenshots:
My test lab,
192.168.37.130 : Server 2019 Domain Controller
192.168.37.131 : Ubuntu 6.8.0.-31
And also including UID brute force for if anonymously authentication fail.