Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci: scrutinizer simplification #36

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 15, 2023
Merged

ci: scrutinizer simplification #36

merged 3 commits into from
Feb 15, 2023

Conversation

g105b
Copy link
Member

@g105b g105b commented Feb 15, 2023

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 15, 2023

Codecov Report

Base: 99.59% // Head: 99.59% // No change to project coverage 👍

Coverage data is based on head (b4d8434) compared to base (1beed3e).
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

❗ Current head b4d8434 differs from pull request most recent head c03159b. Consider uploading reports for the commit c03159b to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master      #36   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     99.59%   99.59%           
  Complexity      106      106           
=========================================
  Files            15       15           
  Lines           248      248           
=========================================
  Hits            247      247           
  Misses            1        1           

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@g105b g105b merged commit 4f38388 into master Feb 15, 2023
@g105b g105b deleted the scrutinizer-simplification branch February 15, 2023 15:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant