Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: sqllogic test pod use specify node #3017

Merged

Conversation

purelind
Copy link
Collaborator

@purelind purelind commented Jun 27, 2024

User description

sqllogic test pod use specify node to avoid the test script from getting stuck


PR Type

enhancement


Description

  • Added a node selector for ci-nvme-high-performance with value true in the latest pipeline configuration.
  • Added a node selector for ci-nvme-high-performance with value true in the release-8.2 pipeline configuration.

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Enhancement
pod-pull_sqllogic_test.yaml
Add node selector for high-performance NVMe in latest pipeline

pipelines/pingcap/tidb/latest/pod-pull_sqllogic_test.yaml

  • Added a node selector for ci-nvme-high-performance with value true.
  • +4/-0     
    pod-pull_sqllogic_test.yaml
    Add node selector for high-performance NVMe in release-8.2 pipeline

    pipelines/pingcap/tidb/release-8.2/pod-pull_sqllogic_test.yaml

  • Added a node selector for ci-nvme-high-performance with value true.
  • +5/-0     

    💡 PR-Agent usage:
    Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available PR-Agent tools and their descriptions

    Copy link

    ti-chi-bot bot commented Jun 27, 2024

    I have already done a preliminary review for you, and I hope to help you do a better job.

    Based on the PR title and description, it seems that the changes are related to specifying a node for the sqllogic test pod to avoid the test script from getting stuck. Looking at the diff, it appears that the change adds the ci-nvme-high-performance key to the pod spec with the value of true in both the latest and release-8.2 branches.

    There are no potential problems that I can identify from this change. However, it would be helpful if the author could provide more context on why this change was necessary and how it solves the problem.

    As for fixing suggestions, since this is a small change and there are no potential issues, it looks good to merge as is. However, it's always a good practice to have a peer review the code changes before merging.

    Copy link

    ti-chi-bot bot commented Jun 27, 2024

    [APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

    Approval requirements bypassed by manually added approval.

    This pull-request has been approved by:

    The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

    The pull request process is described here

    Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

    Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
    Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

    @ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the size/XS label Jun 27, 2024
    Copy link
    Contributor

    PR-Agent was enabled for this repository. To continue using it, please link your git user with your CodiumAI identity here.

    PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5] 2
    🧪 Relevant tests No
    🔒 Security concerns No
    ⚡ Key issues to review None

    Copy link
    Contributor

    PR-Agent was enabled for this repository. To continue using it, please link your git user with your CodiumAI identity here.

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
    Maintainability
    Improve the clarity of the value for 'ci-nvme-high-performance'

    Consider using a more descriptive value than "true" for the 'ci-nvme-high-performance' key
    to enhance clarity and maintainability. If the intention is to specify that the node
    should have NVMe with high performance, a more explicit value could better communicate the
    requirement.

    pipelines/pingcap/tidb/latest/pod-pull_sqllogic_test.yaml [33-36]

     - key: ci-nvme-high-performance
       operator: In
       values:
    -    - "true"
    +    - "enabled"
     
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7

    Why: The suggestion to use a more descriptive value than "true" for the 'ci-nvme-high-performance' key enhances clarity and maintainability. However, it is a minor improvement and does not address any major bugs or issues.

    7

    @ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot merged commit fbaaa2f into PingCAP-QE:main Jun 27, 2024
    1 check passed
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Projects
    Status: Done
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    1 participant