Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(scripts/artifacts): fix check-tiup.sh #3023

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 4, 2024
Merged

Conversation

wuhuizuo
Copy link
Collaborator

@wuhuizuo wuhuizuo commented Jul 4, 2024

User description

Signed-off-by: wuhuizuo wuhuizuo@126.com


PR Type

Bug fix


Description

  • Added a command to create results.yaml file if it does not exist in scripts/artifacts/check-tiup.sh.
  • This prevents potential errors when the script attempts to modify a non-existent file.

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Bug fix
check-tiup.sh
Ensure `results.yaml` file exists before modification       

scripts/artifacts/check-tiup.sh

  • Added a command to create results.yaml file if it does not exist.
  • +1/-0     

    💡 PR-Agent usage:
    Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available PR-Agent tools and their descriptions

    Signed-off-by: wuhuizuo <wuhuizuo@126.com>
    @ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot requested a review from purelind July 4, 2024 12:37
    Copy link

    ti-chi-bot bot commented Jul 4, 2024

    I have already done a preliminary review for you, and I hope to help you do a better job.

    Based on the Pull Request title and description, it seems that this change fixes an issue with the check-tiup.sh script in the scripts/artifacts directory. The diff shows that a results.yaml file is being touched in the function gather_results().

    There are no obvious potential problems with this change. However, one suggestion for improvement could be to add more information to the Pull Request description to better explain the issue that was fixed and how this change addresses it. Additionally, it would be helpful to have some context on why the results.yaml file was added and how it relates to the issue being fixed.

    As for fixing suggestions, it seems that this change is relatively straightforward and does not require any further improvements. However, it would be good to double-check that the changes do not introduce any new issues.

    Copy link
    Contributor

    qodo-merge-pro bot commented Jul 4, 2024

    PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 1 🔵⚪⚪⚪⚪
    🧪 No relevant tests
    🔒 No security concerns identified
    ⚡ Key issues to review

    None

    @wuhuizuo
    Copy link
    Collaborator Author

    wuhuizuo commented Jul 4, 2024

    /approve

    Copy link
    Contributor

    qodo-merge-pro bot commented Jul 4, 2024

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
    Enhancement
    Use the yq command with the -n flag to create and initialize the results.yaml file in one step

    Instead of using touch to create the results.yaml file, you can use the yq command with
    the -n flag to create the file if it doesn't exist. This approach ensures that the file is
    created and initialized in one step.

    scripts/artifacts/check-tiup.sh [23-24]

    -touch results.yaml
    -yq -i '.tiup = {}' results.yaml
    +yq -n -i '.tiup = {}' > results.yaml
     
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8

    Why: The suggestion improves the script by combining file creation and initialization into a single command, enhancing efficiency and reducing the number of lines of code.

    8

    @ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the approved label Jul 4, 2024
    @wuhuizuo
    Copy link
    Collaborator Author

    wuhuizuo commented Jul 4, 2024

    /hold

    @wuhuizuo
    Copy link
    Collaborator Author

    wuhuizuo commented Jul 4, 2024

    /unhold
    /approve

    Copy link

    ti-chi-bot bot commented Jul 4, 2024

    [APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

    This pull-request has been approved by: wuhuizuo

    The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

    The pull request process is described here

    Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

    Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
    Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

    @wuhuizuo wuhuizuo added the lgtm label Jul 4, 2024
    @ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot merged commit 84aa655 into main Jul 4, 2024
    1 check passed
    @ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot deleted the fix/check-script branch July 4, 2024 12:42
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Projects
    Status: Done
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    1 participant