Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support branch for proxy #3054

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 6, 2024
Merged

Conversation

CalvinNeo
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

a
Signed-off-by: CalvinNeo <calvinneo1995@gmail.com>
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Aug 6, 2024

I have already done a preliminary review for you, and I hope to help you do a better job.

Based on the pull request title and the diff, it appears that the changes add support for a new branch for the proxy. The change is to the latest-presubmits.yaml file, adding a new regular expression pattern for the raftstore-proxy branch. This new pattern supports versions 7.x.x and 8.x.x of the branch.

As for potential problems, there are a few things to consider. First, it's unclear from the pull request description why this change is needed or what kind of impact it will have on the system. Additionally, it's possible that adding a new pattern to the regular expression may have unintended consequences for other parts of the system. Finally, it's unclear if there are any tests or other checks in place to ensure that this change doesn't introduce any regressions or issues.

To address these potential problems, I would suggest the following:

  • Ask the pull request author to provide more context on why this change is needed and what kind of impact it will have on the system. This will help to ensure that the change is necessary and that it won't cause any unintended consequences.
  • Review the regular expression pattern to ensure that it won't have any unintended consequences for other parts of the system. If necessary, consider adding additional tests or checks to ensure that the change doesn't introduce any regressions or issues.
  • Consider adding additional tests or checks to ensure that the change doesn't introduce any regressions or issues. This could include running integration tests or other automated checks to ensure that the system continues to function as expected after the change is made.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the size/XS label Aug 6, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@purelind purelind left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the lgtm label Aug 6, 2024
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Aug 6, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: purelind

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Aug 6, 2024

[LGTM Timeline notifier]

Timeline:

  • 2024-08-06 06:30:17.121945334 +0000 UTC m=+333546.989044448: ☑️ agreed by purelind.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the approved label Aug 6, 2024
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot merged commit 76d0a97 into PingCAP-QE:main Aug 6, 2024
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants