Skip to content

Conversation

@andrewjschuang
Copy link
Contributor

@andrewjschuang andrewjschuang commented Jun 5, 2024

WHY

Fix bug when filePath is undefined. Additionally, a small improvement check for filePath?.startsWith("/tmp/")

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved file path validation for Google Drive uploads to prevent incorrect path handling.
  • Chores

    • Updated the Google Drive component version to ensure compatibility and stability.

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Jun 5, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

3 Ignored Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
docs-v2 ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Jun 5, 2024 0:40am
pipedream-docs ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Jun 5, 2024 0:40am
pipedream-docs-redirect-do-not-edit ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Jun 5, 2024 0:40am

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 5, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent updates to the Google Drive component involve a minor version bump for both the upload-file.mjs module and the package.json file. The key change in the upload-file.mjs module is the modification of the filePath condition from using includes to startsWith. This adjustment likely improves the accuracy of file path checks. The package version in package.json has also been incremented to reflect these updates.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
components/google_drive/actions/upload-file/upload-file.mjs Version updated from "0.1.7" to "0.1.8". Modified filePath condition to use startsWith instead of includes.
components/google_drive/package.json Version updated from "0.8.1" to "0.8.2" for the @pipedream/google_drive package.

Poem

In the realm of Drive, a change so slight,
Paths now start, not just in sight.
Version bumps with numbers new,
Enhancing the code, through and through.
A rabbit's cheer for code refined,
In every line, improvements find.
🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1fb623a and 78d107d.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • components/google_drive/actions/upload-file/upload-file.mjs (2 hunks)
  • components/google_drive/package.json (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • components/google_drive/actions/upload-file/upload-file.mjs
  • components/google_drive/package.json

@andrewjschuang andrewjschuang merged commit ef83ecf into master Jun 5, 2024
@andrewjschuang andrewjschuang deleted the google-drive-upload-file-fix-file-path branch June 5, 2024 12:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants