-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.6k
New Components - agiliron #13883
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
New Components - agiliron #13883
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces new functionalities to the Agiliron platform, including actions for creating contacts, leads, and events, as well as sources for emitting events when new contacts, leads, and tasks are created. It enhances the application's ability to manage customer relationship data by implementing structured properties and methods that interact with the Agiliron API. Additionally, a set of constants and utility functions are added to streamline data handling and improve maintainability. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant AgilironAPI
participant CreateContact
participant CreateLead
participant CreateEvent
User->>CreateContact: Request to create contact
CreateContact->>AgilironAPI: Send contact data
AgilironAPI-->>CreateContact: Return contact ID
CreateContact-->>User: Respond with contact ID
User->>CreateLead: Request to create lead
CreateLead->>AgilironAPI: Send lead data
AgilironAPI-->>CreateLead: Return lead ID
CreateLead-->>User: Respond with lead ID
User->>CreateEvent: Request to create event
CreateEvent->>AgilironAPI: Send event data
AgilironAPI-->>CreateEvent: Return event ID
CreateEvent-->>User: Respond with event ID
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
Sources - New Contact Created - New Lead Created - New Task Created Actions - Create Contact - Create Lead - Create Event
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
components/agiliron/common/utils.mjs (1)
1-24: LGTM, but consider adding type annotations and documentation comments.The
parseObjectfunction looks good and handles the parsing of objects, arrays, and strings correctly. The recursive parsing of array elements and the graceful handling of invalid JSON are nice touches.However, consider adding the following improvements:
- Add type annotations to the function parameters and return value to improve code readability and catch potential type-related issues.
- Add documentation comments (JSDoc) to explain the purpose, parameters, and return value of the function. This will help other developers understand how to use the function correctly.
Apply this diff to add type annotations and documentation comments:
+/** + * Parses a given object, array, or string. + * + * @param {any} obj - The input to parse. + * @returns {any} The parsed object, array, or string. Returns undefined if the input is undefined or null. + */ -export const parseObject = (obj) => { +export const parseObject = (obj: any): any => { if (!obj) return undefined; if (Array.isArray(obj)) { return obj.map((item) => { if (typeof item === "string") { try { return JSON.parse(item); } catch (e) { return item; } } return item; }); } if (typeof obj === "string") { try { return JSON.parse(obj); } catch (e) { return obj; } } return obj; };components/agiliron/sources/new-lead-created/new-lead-created.mjs (1)
5-30: LGTM! The component is well-structured and follows best practices.The component is well-structured and follows the best practices for creating a source component. It extends the base object and defines its own properties and methods. The naming convention and structure are consistent with other components.
Some suggestions for improvement:
- Consider adding more detailed documentation for the component, including the purpose, usage, and any limitations or considerations.
- Consider adding more test cases to cover different scenarios and edge cases.
- Consider adding error handling and logging to the component to improve the debugging experience.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
Files selected for processing (14)
- components/agiliron/actions/create-contact/create-contact.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/agiliron/actions/create-event/create-event.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/agiliron/actions/create-lead/create-lead.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/agiliron/agiliron.app.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/agiliron/common/constants.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/agiliron/common/utils.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/agiliron/package.json (2 hunks)
- components/agiliron/sources/common/base.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/agiliron/sources/new-contact-created/new-contact-created.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/agiliron/sources/new-contact-created/test-event.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/agiliron/sources/new-lead-created/new-lead-created.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/agiliron/sources/new-lead-created/test-event.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/agiliron/sources/new-task-created/new-task-created.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/agiliron/sources/new-task-created/test-event.mjs (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- components/agiliron/sources/new-task-created/test-event.mjs
Additional comments not posted (56)
components/agiliron/package.json (2)
3-3: Version number update looks good!The version number has been incremented from
0.0.1to0.1.0, which aligns with the addition of new functionality in this PR.
15-17: Dependencies section looks good, but verify the impact.The addition of the
dependenciessection and the specified dependency on@pipedream/platformwith version^3.0.1is approved.However, ensure that the integration with
@pipedream/platformis thoroughly tested to confirm that it behaves as expected and does not introduce any unintended side effects or breaking changes.Run the following script to verify the impact of the dependency:
components/agiliron/sources/new-task-created/new-task-created.mjs (4)
1-3: LGTM!The import statements are correctly defined and follow a modular approach by importing constants, common functionality, and test events from separate files.
5-12: LGTM!The exported object is correctly defined with appropriate metadata properties such as key, name, description, version, type, and dedupe strategy. The object also inherits common properties and methods using the spread operator.
13-28: LGTM!The methods object is correctly defined with the necessary methods for the source component:
- getFields: Maps the task data fields to standardized field names.
- getFunction: Specifies the API method (getTasks) to retrieve tasks from Agiliron.
- getSummary: Generates a summary string for each task.
The methods object also inherits common methods using the spread operator.
29-29: LGTM!The sampleEmit property is correctly included in the exported object. It likely provides a sample event for testing or documentation purposes, which is a good practice.
components/agiliron/sources/new-contact-created/new-contact-created.mjs (4)
1-3: LGTM!The import statements are correctly defined and follow the proper syntax. The relative paths are used correctly to import the required modules.
5-30: LGTM!The exported default object is correctly defined and follows the proper syntax. The object extends the common base object correctly using the spread operator. The object properties are defined correctly with appropriate values. The object methods are defined correctly and seem to perform the intended functionality. The sampleEmit module is included correctly.
15-21: LGTM!The getFields method is correctly defined and follows the proper syntax. The method returns the expected fields for the contact object. The method uses the spread operator correctly to include additional fields from the constants.TYPE_FIELDS.Contacts object.
25-27: LGTM!The getSummary method is correctly defined and follows the proper syntax. The method takes the contact object as a parameter correctly. The method generates a meaningful summary string using the FirstName and LastName properties of the contact object.
components/agiliron/sources/new-lead-created/test-event.mjs (1)
1-48: LGTM!The JSON object is a well-formed and comprehensive test event for the new lead created source in Agiliron. It contains a good mix of properties with clear names and realistic values, making it an effective test event for the source.
The object includes essential details such as:
- Lead name and contact information
- Company details
- Lead source, status, and rating
- Custom fields
This test event should provide good coverage for testing the new lead created source and ensure that it can handle the various properties and data types that may be included in a real event from Agiliron.
components/agiliron/sources/new-contact-created/test-event.mjs (1)
1-58: LGTM!The test event object for a new contact created in Agiliron looks good:
- The object structure aligns with the expected format for a new contact event.
- The property names and values are consistent with the Agiliron API documentation.
- The test event provides comprehensive coverage of the contact details, including custom fields.
Great job on creating a thorough test event!
components/agiliron/sources/common/base.mjs (5)
1-2: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
5-14: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
15-57: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
59-63: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
64-66: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
components/agiliron/common/constants.mjs (14)
1-8: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
10-26: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
28-43: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
45-59: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
61-74: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
76-83: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
85-88: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
90-93: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
95-111: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
113-119: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
121-129: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
131-135: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
137-140: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
142-193: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
components/agiliron/agiliron.app.mjs (12)
7-95: LGTM!The addition of the
propDefinitionsobject is a great enhancement to the component. It provides a structured way to define properties related to contacts and leads, including essential metadata for each property. The asyncoptionsmethod for thecontactNameproperty is a nice touch, enabling dynamic selection options fetched from the API.
97-99: LGTM!The
_baseUrlmethod is a nice addition to encapsulate the logic for constructing the base URL for API requests. By utilizing thesubdomainfrom the authentication object, it ensures that the correct URL is used for each authenticated user, promoting code reusability and maintainability.
100-106: LGTM!The
_headersmethod is a great addition to centralize the logic for constructing request headers. By merging the providedheaderswith theAcceptheader and theapi_keyfrom the authentication object, it ensures consistency across API calls and includes the necessary headers for successful API requests.
107-115: LGTM!The
_makeRequestmethod is a great abstraction for making API requests. By utilizing the_baseUrland_headersmethods to construct the URL and headers, it ensures consistency across requests and promotes code reusability. The use of theaxioslibrary simplifies the process of making HTTP requests, and the ability to accept additional options allows for flexibility in customizing the requests.
116-122: LGTM!The
addContactmethod is a convenient addition to the component, providing a straightforward way to add a new contact using the API. By leveraging the_makeRequestmethod to handle the request details, it promotes code reusability and keeps the method implementation concise.
123-129: LGTM!The
addLeadmethod is a useful addition to the component, providing an easy way to add a new lead using the API. Similar to theaddContactmethod, it leverages the_makeRequestmethod to handle the request details, promoting code reusability and keeping the method implementation concise.
130-136: LGTM!The
addEventmethod is a handy addition to the component, allowing for easy creation of new events using the API. It follows the same pattern as theaddContactandaddLeadmethods, utilizing the_makeRequestmethod to handle the request details and promote code reusability.
137-142: LGTM!The
getContactsmethod is a useful addition to the component, providing a simple way to retrieve contacts from the API. It follows the established pattern of using the_makeRequestmethod to handle the request details, promoting code reusability and keeping the method implementation concise.
143-148: LGTM!The
getLeadsmethod is a valuable addition to the component, offering an easy way to retrieve leads from the API. Similar to thegetContactsmethod, it utilizes the_makeRequestmethod to handle the request details, promoting code reusability and maintaining a consistent implementation approach.
149-154: LGTM!The
getTasksmethod is a useful addition to the component, providing a straightforward way to retrieve tasks from the API. It follows the same implementation pattern as thegetContactsandgetLeadsmethods, leveraging the_makeRequestmethod to handle the request details and promote code reusability.
155-177: LGTM!The
prepareItemsmethod is a versatile addition to the component, providing a flexible way to prepare items based on different types and pagination. By leveraging theconstantsobject to map types to API endpoints and field names, it promotes code maintainability and reusability. The use of the_makeRequestmethod ensures consistent API request handling, and the construction of the name string based on the specified fields allows for customizable item naming. Overall, this method is a valuable asset for handling various item types and pagination scenarios.
178-200: LGTM!The
paginatemethod is a powerful addition to the component, providing a generic pagination mechanism that can be used with different API endpoints and functions. By abstracting the pagination logic, it makes it easier to handle paginated data consistently across the codebase. The use of async generator syntax (async*) is a great choice, as it allows for efficient iteration over paginated data without loading all items into memory at once. The method also handles API errors gracefully by returningfalseif an error occurs during pagination. Overall, this method is a valuable utility for dealing with paginated API responses in a clean and efficient manner.components/agiliron/actions/create-event/create-event.mjs (6)
1-3: LGTM!The import statements are correctly used to bring in the required dependencies.
11-139: LGTM!The
propsobject is well-defined with appropriate types, labels, descriptions, and options. The use of constants for options ensures consistency and maintainability. Theoptionalflag is used appropriately to mark non-required properties.
140-157: LGTM!The
additionalPropsmethod correctly adds therelatedToValueproperty based on the presence ofrelatedToType. The dynamic options list is fetched using theprepareItemsmethod of the Agiliron API client, and thepageparameter is correctly incremented to fetch the next page of results.
159-163: LGTM!The custom fields parsing logic correctly handles the
customFieldsproperty and converts it to the expected format for the API request. The use of theparseObjectutility function ensures consistent parsing of the custom fields.
165-191: LGTM!The event object creation logic correctly maps the action's properties to the corresponding API request properties. The use of a ternary operator for the
RepeatUntilproperty ensures a default value is set if not provided. The custom fields are correctly included in theEventCustomFieldsproperty.
193-203: LGTM!The API request is correctly made using the
addEventmethod with the appropriate request data. The response handling logic exports a summary of the created event's ID, providing useful feedback to the user. Returning the entire response allows for further processing or error handling if needed.components/agiliron/actions/create-lead/create-lead.mjs (3)
1-4: Imports look good.The imported modules and functions seem to be used appropriately in the file. No unused imports detected.
6-203: The action definition looks structurally correct.
- The object exported by the file correctly defines an action with appropriate metadata properties like
key,name,description,version, andtype.- The
propscover a wide range of input fields needed to create a lead, with most of them marked as optional for flexibility.- The
runmethod is appropriately defined as anasyncfunction.
204-260: Therunmethod implementation looks good.
- The method starts with a validation check to ensure that only one of
assignedToorassignedGroupNameis provided, throwing a clearConfigurationErrorif both are present.- Parsing the
customFieldsinput using theparseObjectutility is a good practice to handle JSON input gracefully.- The
leadobject is constructed correctly, mapping the input properties to the keys expected by the Agiliron API.- The API call to create the lead is made with proper error handling, using
awaitand passing the$object for logging.- Exporting a user-friendly
$summarymessage with the created lead ID and returning the full API response for further processing is a nice touch.components/agiliron/actions/create-contact/create-contact.mjs (4)
4-234: LGTM!The action definition and properties look good:
- The action is correctly defined as a default export.
- Most properties are appropriately marked as optional, providing flexibility.
- Some properties correctly use
propDefinitionfrom theagilironapp for consistency.
236-240: LGTM!The usage of the
parseObjectutility function looks good:
- Importing and using a utility function for parsing is a good practice for code reuse and maintainability.
- The
parseObjectfunction is correctly used to parse thecustomFieldsstring into an object.
241-277: LGTM!The construction of the
contactobject looks good:
- The
contactobject is correctly constructed using the action's properties.- The
CustomFieldsproperty is correctly set to an object with aCustomFieldarray, which is the format expected by the Agiliron API.
279-289: LGTM!The API call and response handling look good:
- The
addContactmethod is called with the constructedcontactobject in the correct format.- Exporting a summary of the created contact ID using
$.exportis useful for users.- Returning the full API response is good for debugging and further processing.
GTFalcao
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
Resolves #13871.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Documentation
Chores