New Components - jigsawstack #13929
New Components - jigsawstack #13929
Conversation
luancazarine
added
the
ai-assisted
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
3 Skipped Deployments
|
WalkthroughThe changes introduce several new actions for the JigsawStack API, including object detection, sentiment analysis, and email validation. Each action is implemented in its own module, allowing users to interact with the API by providing specific inputs. Additionally, utility functions for error handling and file path validation are added. The overall structure enhances the functionality of the JigsawStack integration, improving the organization and maintainability of the codebase. Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Actions - Verify Email - Object Detection - Sentiment Analysis
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
components/jigsawstack/common/utils.mjs (1)
8-13: Consider simplifying the function using a template literal.The function can be simplified by using a template literal instead of an if-else statement.
Apply this diff to simplify the function:
export const checkTmp = (filename) => { - if (!filename.startsWith("/tmp")) { - return `/tmp/${filename}`; - } - return filename; + return filename.startsWith("/tmp") ? filename : `/tmp/${filename}`; };
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
Files selected for processing (6)
- components/jigsawstack/actions/object-detection/object-detection.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/jigsawstack/actions/sentiment-analysis/sentiment-analysis.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/jigsawstack/actions/verify-email/verify-email.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/jigsawstack/common/utils.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/jigsawstack/jigsawstack.app.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/jigsawstack/package.json (2 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (17)
components/jigsawstack/package.json (3)
3-3: LGTM!The minor version increment from
0.0.1to0.1.0aligns with the PR objective of introducing new components for jigsawstack. It correctly indicates the addition of new backwards compatible functionality.
14-14: LGTM!Setting
"access": "public"in thepublishConfigis a good practice. It ensures that the package is published publicly and accessible to everyone.
15-18: Dependencies look good, but verify their usage.The addition of the
@pipedream/platform,form-data, andmimedependencies aligns with the PR objective of introducing new components that may require handling HTTP requests and file uploads. The version constraints also follow semantic versioning best practices.However, it's important to verify that these dependencies are being used correctly in the codebase.
Run the following script to verify the usage of the dependencies:
Verification successful
Dependencies are correctly used in the codebase.
The dependencies
@pipedream/platform,form-data, andmimeare actively used across various components, confirming their integration and usage for handling HTTP requests and file uploads. This aligns with the PR objectives and follows best practices.
@pipedream/platformis used in multiple components for HTTP requests and configuration.form-datais utilized for handling multipart form data in HTTP requests.mimeis referenced for MIME type handling.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the added dependencies. # Test: Search for the usage of `@pipedream/platform`. Expect: At least one occurrence. rg --type typescript -A 5 $'@pipedream/platform' # Test: Search for the usage of `form-data`. Expect: At least one occurrence. rg --type typescript -A 5 $'form-data' # Test: Search for the usage of `mime`. Expect: At least one occurrence. rg --type typescript -A 5 $'mime'Length of output: 223
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the added dependencies using the correct file type. # Test: Search for the usage of `@pipedream/platform`. Expect: At least one occurrence. rg --type ts -A 5 $'@pipedream/platform' # Test: Search for the usage of `form-data`. Expect: At least one occurrence. rg --type ts -A 5 $'form-data' # Test: Search for the usage of `mime`. Expect: At least one occurrence. rg --type ts -A 5 $'mime'Length of output: 58352
components/jigsawstack/actions/verify-email/verify-email.mjs (1)
4-33: LGTM!The component definition looks good and follows best practices:
- The metadata properties like
key,name,description,version, andtypeare appropriately defined.- The
propsinclude the necessary properties with correct types and descriptions.- The
runmethod implementation is correct, making use oftry/catchfor error handling, exporting a summary, and returning the API response.Great job!
components/jigsawstack/actions/sentiment-analysis/sentiment-analysis.mjs (4)
1-3: LGTM!The imports are correctly defined and follow the ES module syntax. The imported modules seem to be custom utility and configuration modules within the project.
4-17: LGTM!The action metadata is defined using a clear and concise object structure. The properties like
key,name,description,version, andtypeprovide important information about the action. Thepropsschema is defined using a simple and understandable structure, with thetextproperty marked as a required input. The code follows good practices and is well-documented.
18-28: LGTM!The
runmethod is implemented correctly as an asynchronous function. It destructures the$object from the input argument and calls theanalyzeSentimentmethod of thejigsawstackobject with the providedtextinput. The API call is made with the correct parameters, and the response is stored in theresponsevariable. The$.exportmethod is used to set a summary of the sentiment analysis result, which can be useful for logging or further processing. Finally, theresponseis returned from the method, allowing the action's output to be used by subsequent steps in the Pipedream workflow. The code is well-structured and follows good practices.
29-32: LGTM!The catch block is implemented correctly to handle any errors that occur within the try block. By passing the caught error to the
throwErrorutility function, the code maintains a consistent error handling mechanism. This approach allows the Pipedream platform to handle and report the error appropriately. The code demonstrates good error handling practices.components/jigsawstack/jigsawstack.app.mjs (3)
7-9: LGTM!The
_baseUrlmethod correctly returns the base URL for the JigsawStack API.
10-15: LGTM!The
_headersmethod correctly constructs the necessary headers for API requests, including the API key from the authentication data.
16-24: LGTM!The
_makeRequestmethod correctly centralizes the request-making process, allowing for easier management of API calls with customizable options. It uses the_baseUrland_headersmethods to construct the URL and headers for the request, and theaxioslibrary to send the request, which is a popular and well-maintained library for making HTTP requests.components/jigsawstack/actions/object-detection/object-detection.mjs (6)
1-8: LGTM!The imports are correctly used in the code.
10-36: Looks good!The action metadata is well-defined with clear descriptions for the props.
37-45: Good validation!The destructuring of props and the validation to ensure only one prop is provided are good practices.
47-59: Nicely done!The code to handle the
fileStoreKeyandimageFileprops is well-implemented. Uploading the local image file to Jigsawstack and setting thefile_store_keyprop is a good approach.
61-68: Looks good!The code to call the Jigsawstack API and handle the response is well-implemented.
69-73: Good error handling!Catching errors and using the
throwErrorutility function is a good practice for consistent error handling.
Resolves #13924.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation