[Components] gainsight_px #14359 #14467
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 3 Skipped Deployments
|
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@lcaresia has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 12 minutes and 54 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThis pull request introduces several new modules and enhancements to the Gainsight PX application. Key additions include modules for creating and deleting users and accounts, along with a constants module defining user types. The main application file has been updated to include new properties and methods for managing user and account operations. Additionally, the package configuration has been updated to reflect a new version and dependencies. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 10
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
components/gainsight_px/actions/create-user/create-user.mjs (2)
1-8: Consider starting with version 1.0.0The module structure and metadata look good, following Pipedream's component conventions. However, since this is a production-ready component, consider starting with version 1.0.0 instead of 0.0.1.
- version: "0.0.1", + version: "1.0.0",
19-24: Add label and description for propertyKeys propThe propertyKeys prop lacks a label and description, which are important for user understanding and documentation.
propertyKeys: { propDefinition: [ app, "propertyKeys" - ] + ], + label: "Property Keys", + description: "Custom properties to be associated with the user" },
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
components/gainsight_px/actions/create-account/create-account.mjs(1 hunks)components/gainsight_px/actions/create-user/create-user.mjs(1 hunks)components/gainsight_px/actions/delete-user/delete-user.mjs(1 hunks)components/gainsight_px/common/contants.mjs(1 hunks)components/gainsight_px/gainsight_px.app.mjs(1 hunks)components/gainsight_px/package.json(2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- components/gainsight_px/common/contants.mjs
🔇 Additional comments (7)
components/gainsight_px/package.json (2)
3-3: LGTM! Version bump follows semantic versioning.
The version increase from 0.0.1 to 0.1.0 appropriately reflects the addition of new features (user and account management) without breaking changes.
15-17: LGTM! Dependencies are correctly specified.
The addition of @pipedream/platform as a dependency with the appropriate version constraint follows Pipedream's component development best practices.
components/gainsight_px/actions/delete-user/delete-user.mjs (2)
1-2: LGTM!
The import statement is clean and properly structured.
9-17: LGTM!
Props are well-structured and properly defined.
components/gainsight_px/actions/create-account/create-account.mjs (2)
7-7: Verify version alignment with app module
The action version is set to "0.0.1". Let's ensure this aligns with the app module's version and other Gainsight PX actions.
#!/bin/bash
# Check versions across Gainsight PX components
echo "Checking versions in Gainsight PX components..."
rg '"version":' components/gainsight_px/ --type json
rg 'version: "' components/gainsight_px/9-47: Verify completeness of account properties
The implementation includes basic account properties, but there might be additional optional fields available in the Gainsight PX API that could be valuable for users.
Let's check the API documentation and other implementations:
✅ Verification successful
Account properties implementation is complete and accurate
Looking at the app definition file, all the implemented properties in the create-account action match exactly with the propDefinitions in the app file. The properties are well-documented and properly marked as required or optional:
- Required: id, name, propertyKeys
- Optional: countryName, stateName, city
The implementation correctly includes all available account properties defined in the Gainsight PX app module, with appropriate types and descriptions.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other account-related implementations to compare properties
rg -l 'gainsight.*account' components/gainsight_px/
# Search for property definitions in the app file
rg 'propDefinition.*account' components/gainsight_px/gainsight_px.app.mjs
Length of output: 604
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a more specific search for account-related files and properties
# Search for account-related files
fd -e mjs -e js account components/gainsight_px/
# Search for property definitions in app file
cat components/gainsight_px/gainsight_px.app.mjs
# Search for any account-related API documentation or types
rg -i "account.*props|account.*properties" components/gainsight_px/
Length of output: 3306
components/gainsight_px/actions/create-user/create-user.mjs (1)
1-1: Verify app module integration
Let's verify that all required methods and prop definitions exist in the app module.
✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different approach to verify the app module integration.
App module integration is verified and complete
The app module contains all the required propDefinitions (id, propertyKeys, type, email, firstName, lastName) and the createUser method. All the necessary components for the integration are present and properly defined in the app module.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the app module contains all required propDefinitions and the createUser method
# Check for propDefinitions
echo "Checking for required propDefinitions..."
ast-grep --pattern 'propDefinitions: {
$$$
id: {
$$$
},
propertyKeys: {
$$$
},
type: {
$$$
},
email: {
$$$
},
firstName: {
$$$
},
lastName: {
$$$
},
$$$
}'
# Check for createUser method
echo "Checking for createUser method..."
ast-grep --pattern 'async createUser({ $, data }) {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 440
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's first locate and examine the app module file
echo "Checking the app module content..."
cat components/gainsight_px/gainsight_px.app.mjs
# As a backup, let's also search for propDefinitions and createUser method with ripgrep
echo -e "\nSearching for propDefinitions..."
rg "propDefinitions.*=.*{" -A 20 components/gainsight_px/gainsight_px.app.mjs
echo -e "\nSearching for createUser method..."
rg "createUser.*{" -A 10 components/gainsight_px/gainsight_px.app.mjs
Length of output: 3712
| export default { | ||
| key: "gainsight_px-delete-user", | ||
| name: "Delete User", | ||
| description: "Deletes a user with he specified identifyId. [See the documentation](https://gainsightpx.docs.apiary.io/#reference/users/v1usersdelete/delete-user)", | ||
| version: "0.0.1", | ||
| type: "action", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix typo in description
There's a typo in the description where "he" should be "the".
- description: "Deletes a user with he specified identifyId. [See the documentation](https://gainsightpx.docs.apiary.io/#reference/users/v1usersdelete/delete-user)",
+ description: "Deletes a user with the specified identifyId. [See the documentation](https://gainsightpx.docs.apiary.io/#reference/users/v1usersdelete/delete-user)",📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export default { | |
| key: "gainsight_px-delete-user", | |
| name: "Delete User", | |
| description: "Deletes a user with he specified identifyId. [See the documentation](https://gainsightpx.docs.apiary.io/#reference/users/v1usersdelete/delete-user)", | |
| version: "0.0.1", | |
| type: "action", | |
| export default { | |
| key: "gainsight_px-delete-user", | |
| name: "Delete User", | |
| description: "Deletes a user with the specified identifyId. [See the documentation](https://gainsightpx.docs.apiary.io/#reference/users/v1usersdelete/delete-user)", | |
| version: "0.0.1", | |
| type: "action", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@jcortes, here's the corrected description with the typo fixed:
description: "Deletes a user with the specified identifyId. [See the documentation](https://gainsightpx.docs.apiary.io/#reference/users/v1usersdelete/delete-user)",Please update your code accordingly.
| key: "gainsight_px-create-account", | ||
| name: "Create Memory", | ||
| description: "Create a new account with the given data. [See the documentation](https://gainsightpx.docs.apiary.io/#reference/accounts/v1accounts/create-account)", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Action name doesn't match its functionality
The action name "Create Memory" is inconsistent with its actual functionality of creating an account. This could be confusing for users.
Consider updating the name to better reflect the action's purpose:
- name: "Create Memory",
+ name: "Create Account",📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| key: "gainsight_px-create-account", | |
| name: "Create Memory", | |
| description: "Create a new account with the given data. [See the documentation](https://gainsightpx.docs.apiary.io/#reference/accounts/v1accounts/create-account)", | |
| key: "gainsight_px-create-account", | |
| name: "Create Account", | |
| description: "Create a new account with the given data. [See the documentation](https://gainsightpx.docs.apiary.io/#reference/accounts/v1accounts/create-account)", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@jcortes, thank you for pointing out the typo. I'll make sure to watch out for such issues in future reviews.
(\ (
( -.-)
o_(")(")
✏️ Learnings added
Learnt from: jcortes
PR: PipedreamHQ/pipedream#14467
File: components/gainsight_px/actions/create-account/create-account.mjs:4-6
Timestamp: 2024-10-30T15:24:39.127Z
Learning: In `components/gainsight_px/actions/create-account/create-account.mjs`, the action name should be "Create Account" instead of "Create Memory".
Note: Learnings are effective only in the context of similar code segments. To apply general coding guidelines, please configure review instructions. You can manage existing learnings in the app.
| }, | ||
| countryName: { | ||
| type: "string", | ||
| label: "County Name", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Correct label typo: 'County Name' should be 'Country Name'.
In the countryName property definition, the label is misspelled as "County Name" instead of "Country Name".
Apply this diff to fix the label:
label: "County Name",
+label: "Country Name",Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| @@ -1,11 +1,129 @@ | |||
| import { axios } from "@pipedream/platform"; | |||
| import contants from "./common/contants.mjs"; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix typo in import statement: 'contants' should be 'constants'.
There is a typo in the import statement on line 2. The module name "contants" should be "constants" to correctly import the module.
Apply this diff to correct the import:
-import contants from "./common/contants.mjs";
+import constants from "./common/constants.mjs";📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| import contants from "./common/contants.mjs"; | |
| import constants from "./common/constants.mjs"; |
| type: "string", | ||
| label: "User Type", | ||
| description: "Type of the user", | ||
| options: contants.USER_TYPES, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Update variable reference: 'contants.USER_TYPES' should be 'constants.USER_TYPES'.
The options for the type property are referencing contants.USER_TYPES, but "contants" is misspelled. It should be constants.USER_TYPES to correctly access the user types.
Apply this diff to correct the variable reference:
options: contants.USER_TYPES,
+options: constants.USER_TYPES,Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| key: "gainsight_px-create-account", | ||
| name: "Create Memory", | ||
| description: "Create a new account with the given data. [See the documentation](https://gainsightpx.docs.apiary.io/#reference/accounts/v1accounts/create-account)", |
| export default { | ||
| key: "gainsight_px-delete-user", | ||
| name: "Delete User", | ||
| description: "Deletes a user with he specified identifyId. [See the documentation](https://gainsightpx.docs.apiary.io/#reference/users/v1usersdelete/delete-user)", | ||
| version: "0.0.1", | ||
| type: "action", |
| @@ -1,11 +1,129 @@ | |||
| import { axios } from "@pipedream/platform"; | |||
| import contants from "./common/contants.mjs"; | |||
| }, | ||
| countryName: { | ||
| type: "string", | ||
| label: "County Name", |
| type: "string", | ||
| label: "User Type", | ||
| description: "Type of the user", | ||
| options: contants.USER_TYPES, |
components/gainsight_px/actions/create-account/create-account.mjs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
components/gainsight_px/actions/create-account/create-account.mjs(1 hunks)components/gainsight_px/gainsight_px.app.mjs(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (9)
components/gainsight_px/actions/create-account/create-account.mjs (4)
1-2: LGTM!
The import statement is clean and correctly defined.
3-8: LGTM!
The action metadata is well-defined with:
- Clear naming that matches functionality
- Helpful documentation link
- Proper versioning
49-67: Previous review comment about error handling is still applicable.
The implementation would benefit from proper error handling and input validation as suggested in the previous review.
50-62: Verify API payload structure against documentation.
Let's ensure the API payload structure matches the documentation requirements.
components/gainsight_px/gainsight_px.app.mjs (5)
7-78: Property definitions are well-structured
The propDefinitions section provides clear and appropriate definitions for each property with correct types, labels, descriptions, and optional flags. This enhances the maintainability and readability of the code.
101-107: createAccount method is correctly implemented
The createAccount method correctly constructs and sends a POST request to create an account. The usage of spread operators ensures flexibility in passing additional arguments.
108-114: deleteUser method is correctly implemented
The deleteUser method properly constructs and sends a DELETE request to remove a user. The method is concise and follows best practices.
115-121: createUser method is correctly implemented
The createUser method accurately constructs and sends a POST request to add a new user. The code is clean and understandable.
122-127: listUsers method is correctly implemented
The listUsers method effectively retrieves the list of users by sending the appropriate API request. The implementation is straightforward and aligns with the codebase's conventions.
| props: { | ||
| app, | ||
| id: { | ||
| propDefinition: [ | ||
| app, | ||
| "id" | ||
| ] | ||
| }, | ||
| name: { | ||
| propDefinition: [ | ||
| app, | ||
| "name" | ||
| ] | ||
| }, | ||
| propertyKeys: { | ||
| propDefinition: [ | ||
| app, | ||
| "propertyKeys" | ||
| ] | ||
| }, | ||
| countryName: { | ||
| propDefinition: [ | ||
| app, | ||
| "countryName" | ||
| ] | ||
| }, | ||
| stateName: { | ||
| propDefinition: [ | ||
| app, | ||
| "stateName" | ||
| ] | ||
| }, | ||
| city: { | ||
| propDefinition: [ | ||
| app, | ||
| "city" | ||
| ] | ||
| }, | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider grouping location-related props for better organization.
The props are well-defined, but the location-related fields (countryName, stateName, city) could be grouped together for better maintainability.
Consider restructuring the props:
props: {
app,
id: {
propDefinition: [app, "id"]
},
name: {
propDefinition: [app, "name"]
},
propertyKeys: {
propDefinition: [app, "propertyKeys"]
},
- countryName: {
- propDefinition: [app, "countryName"]
- },
- stateName: {
- propDefinition: [app, "stateName"]
- },
- city: {
- propDefinition: [app, "city"]
- },
+ location: {
+ type: "object",
+ label: "Location",
+ properties: {
+ countryName: {
+ propDefinition: [app, "countryName"]
+ },
+ stateName: {
+ propDefinition: [app, "stateName"]
+ },
+ city: {
+ propDefinition: [app, "city"]
+ }
+ }
+ }
}Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| async _makeRequest(opts = {}) { | ||
| const { | ||
| $ = this, | ||
| path, | ||
| headers, | ||
| ...otherOpts | ||
| } = opts; | ||
| return axios($, { | ||
| ...otherOpts, | ||
| url: this._baseUrl() + path, | ||
| headers: { | ||
| ...headers, | ||
| "X-APTRINSIC-API-KEY": `${this.$auth.api_key}`, | ||
| "Accept": `application/json`, | ||
| }, | ||
| }); | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add error handling in _makeRequest method
The _makeRequest method lacks error handling for failed HTTP requests. This could lead to unhandled exceptions and make debugging more difficult. Consider adding error handling to manage potential errors and provide meaningful feedback.
Apply this diff to incorporate error handling:
async _makeRequest(opts = {}) {
const {
$ = this,
path,
headers,
...otherOpts
} = opts;
+ try {
return await axios($, {
...otherOpts,
url: this._baseUrl() + path,
headers: {
...headers,
"X-APTRINSIC-API-KEY": `${this.$auth.api_key}`,
"Accept": `application/json`,
},
});
+ } catch (error) {
+ // Handle the error appropriately
+ this.$emit("Error making request", error);
+ throw error;
+ }
}Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
components/gainsight_px/actions/create-user/create-user.mjs (1)
9-49: Consider improving prop definitions for clarity and validation.
- The
idprop's label "Identify ID" and its usage asidentifyIdin the payload should be consistent.- Consider adding validation rules for required fields and data formats.
id: { propDefinition: [ app, "id", ], - label: "Identify ID", + label: "Identify ID (identifyId)", description: "Identifier of the user", + required: true, }, type: { propDefinition: [ app, "type", ], + required: true, }, email: { propDefinition: [ app, "email", ], + optional: true, },components/gainsight_px/gainsight_px.app.mjs (2)
103-109: Add request body validation for API methods.The createAccount, deleteUser, and createUser methods should validate their input parameters before making the request.
Example for createAccount (apply similar pattern to other methods):
async createAccount(args = {}) { + const requiredFields = ["id", "name", "propertyKeys"]; + const missingFields = requiredFields.filter(field => !args.data?.[field]); + if (missingFields.length > 0) { + throw new Error(`Missing required fields: ${missingFields.join(", ")}`); + } return this._makeRequest({ path: "/accounts", method: "post", ...args, }); }Also applies to: 110-116, 117-123
124-128: Add pagination handling to listUsers method.The listUsers method should handle pagination to ensure all users are retrieved when there are many records.
async listUsers(args = {}) { + const DEFAULT_PAGE_SIZE = 100; + const allUsers = []; + let page = 0; + + while (true) { + const response = await this._makeRequest({ + path: "/users", + params: { + ...args.params, + page, + pageSize: DEFAULT_PAGE_SIZE, + }, + }); + + if (!response?.users?.length) break; + allUsers.push(...response.users); + + if (response.users.length < DEFAULT_PAGE_SIZE) break; + page++; + } + + return { users: allUsers }; }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
components/gainsight_px/actions/create-account/create-account.mjs(1 hunks)components/gainsight_px/actions/create-user/create-user.mjs(1 hunks)components/gainsight_px/actions/delete-user/delete-user.mjs(1 hunks)components/gainsight_px/gainsight_px.app.mjs(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- components/gainsight_px/actions/delete-user/delete-user.mjs
🔇 Additional comments (4)
components/gainsight_px/actions/create-account/create-account.mjs (2)
4-8: LGTM! Well-structured metadata with clear documentation.
The component metadata is properly defined with a descriptive name, helpful documentation link, and appropriate versioning.
9-47: LGTM! Well-defined props with clear dependencies.
The props are properly defined using propDefinitions from the app module, making the component configurable and maintainable.
components/gainsight_px/actions/create-user/create-user.mjs (2)
1-8: LGTM! Well-structured module definition with documentation.
The module is properly structured with clear metadata and includes a link to the API documentation.
51-67: Previous review comment about error handling remains valid.
The implementation still needs improvements in error handling, field validation, and response verification as detailed in the previous review.
Let's verify the error handling in the app module:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if the app module implements proper error handling
rg -A 5 "createUser.*\{" components/gainsight_px/gainsight_px.app.mjs| async run({ $ }) { | ||
| const response = await this.app.createAccount({ | ||
| $, | ||
| data: { | ||
| id: this.id, | ||
| name: this.name, | ||
| propertyKeys: this.propertyKeys, | ||
| location: { | ||
| countryName: this.countryName, | ||
| stateName: this.stateName, | ||
| city: this.city, | ||
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| $.export("$summary", `Successfully created account with the name '${this.name}'`); | ||
|
|
||
| return response; | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling and input validation.
While the implementation is functionally correct, consider adding:
- Basic error handling to provide clear error messages
- Input validation for the propertyKeys array
async run({ $ }) {
+ // Validate propertyKeys if provided
+ if (this.propertyKeys && !Array.isArray(this.propertyKeys)) {
+ throw new Error("propertyKeys must be an array");
+ }
+
+ try {
const response = await this.app.createAccount({
$,
data: {
id: this.id,
name: this.name,
propertyKeys: this.propertyKeys,
location: {
countryName: this.countryName,
stateName: this.stateName,
city: this.city,
},
},
});
$.export("$summary", `Successfully created account with the name '${this.name}'`);
return response;
+ } catch (error) {
+ throw new Error(`Failed to create account: ${error.message}`);
+ }
},📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| async run({ $ }) { | |
| const response = await this.app.createAccount({ | |
| $, | |
| data: { | |
| id: this.id, | |
| name: this.name, | |
| propertyKeys: this.propertyKeys, | |
| location: { | |
| countryName: this.countryName, | |
| stateName: this.stateName, | |
| city: this.city, | |
| }, | |
| }, | |
| }); | |
| $.export("$summary", `Successfully created account with the name '${this.name}'`); | |
| return response; | |
| }, | |
| async run({ $ }) { | |
| // Validate propertyKeys if provided | |
| if (this.propertyKeys && !Array.isArray(this.propertyKeys)) { | |
| throw new Error("propertyKeys must be an array"); | |
| } | |
| try { | |
| const response = await this.app.createAccount({ | |
| $, | |
| data: { | |
| id: this.id, | |
| name: this.name, | |
| propertyKeys: this.propertyKeys, | |
| location: { | |
| countryName: this.countryName, | |
| stateName: this.stateName, | |
| city: this.city, | |
| }, | |
| }, | |
| }); | |
| $.export("$summary", `Successfully created account with the name '${this.name}'`); | |
| return response; | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| throw new Error(`Failed to create account: ${error.message}`); | |
| } | |
| }, |
| identifyId: { | ||
| type: "string", | ||
| label: "Identify ID", | ||
| description: "Identifier of the user", | ||
| async options() { | ||
| const response = await this.listUsers(); | ||
| const userIds = response.users; | ||
| return userIds.map(({ | ||
| identifyId, email, | ||
| }) => ({ | ||
| label: email, | ||
| value: identifyId, | ||
| })); | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add validation and error handling to identifyId options method.
The async options method for identifyId could fail silently if the API request fails. Consider adding validation for the response data and proper error handling.
async options() {
+ try {
const response = await this.listUsers();
+ if (!response?.users) {
+ console.log("Invalid response format from listUsers");
+ return [];
+ }
const userIds = response.users;
return userIds.map(({
identifyId, email,
}) => ({
label: email,
value: identifyId,
}));
+ } catch (error) {
+ console.log("Error fetching user options:", error);
+ return [];
+ }
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| identifyId: { | |
| type: "string", | |
| label: "Identify ID", | |
| description: "Identifier of the user", | |
| async options() { | |
| const response = await this.listUsers(); | |
| const userIds = response.users; | |
| return userIds.map(({ | |
| identifyId, email, | |
| }) => ({ | |
| label: email, | |
| value: identifyId, | |
| })); | |
| }, | |
| identifyId: { | |
| type: "string", | |
| label: "Identify ID", | |
| description: "Identifier of the user", | |
| async options() { | |
| try { | |
| const response = await this.listUsers(); | |
| if (!response?.users) { | |
| console.log("Invalid response format from listUsers"); | |
| return []; | |
| } | |
| const userIds = response.users; | |
| return userIds.map(({ | |
| identifyId, email, | |
| }) => ({ | |
| label: email, | |
| value: identifyId, | |
| })); | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| console.log("Error fetching user options:", error); | |
| return []; | |
| } | |
| }, |
| async _makeRequest(opts = {}) { | ||
| const { | ||
| $ = this, | ||
| path, | ||
| headers, | ||
| ...otherOpts | ||
| } = opts; | ||
| return axios($, { | ||
| ...otherOpts, | ||
| url: this._baseUrl() + path, | ||
| headers: { | ||
| ...headers, | ||
| "X-APTRINSIC-API-KEY": `${this.$auth.api_key}`, | ||
| "Accept": "application/json", | ||
| }, | ||
| }); | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance request handling with proper headers and error management.
The _makeRequest method needs improvements for better request handling:
- Add Content-Type header for POST/DELETE requests
- Add proper error handling
- Validate the base URL
async _makeRequest(opts = {}) {
+ if (!this._baseUrl()) {
+ throw new Error("Base endpoint is not configured");
+ }
const {
$ = this,
path,
headers,
...otherOpts
} = opts;
+ const method = otherOpts.method?.toLowerCase();
+ try {
return axios($, {
...otherOpts,
url: this._baseUrl() + path,
headers: {
...headers,
"X-APTRINSIC-API-KEY": `${this.$auth.api_key}`,
"Accept": "application/json",
+ ...(["post", "delete"].includes(method) && {
+ "Content-Type": "application/json"
+ }),
},
});
+ } catch (error) {
+ console.error("API request failed:", error.message);
+ throw error;
+ }
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| async _makeRequest(opts = {}) { | |
| const { | |
| $ = this, | |
| path, | |
| headers, | |
| ...otherOpts | |
| } = opts; | |
| return axios($, { | |
| ...otherOpts, | |
| url: this._baseUrl() + path, | |
| headers: { | |
| ...headers, | |
| "X-APTRINSIC-API-KEY": `${this.$auth.api_key}`, | |
| "Accept": "application/json", | |
| }, | |
| }); | |
| }, | |
| async _makeRequest(opts = {}) { | |
| if (!this._baseUrl()) { | |
| throw new Error("Base endpoint is not configured"); | |
| } | |
| const { | |
| $ = this, | |
| path, | |
| headers, | |
| ...otherOpts | |
| } = opts; | |
| const method = otherOpts.method?.toLowerCase(); | |
| try { | |
| return axios($, { | |
| ...otherOpts, | |
| url: this._baseUrl() + path, | |
| headers: { | |
| ...headers, | |
| "X-APTRINSIC-API-KEY": `${this.$auth.api_key}`, | |
| "Accept": "application/json", | |
| ...(["post", "delete"].includes(method) && { | |
| "Content-Type": "application/json" | |
| }), | |
| }, | |
| }); | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| console.error("API request failed:", error.message); | |
| throw error; | |
| } | |
| }, |
|
/approve |
WHY
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation