Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

LCCP preparation for CPC #1287

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 29, 2015
Merged

Conversation

mschoeler
Copy link
Contributor

Changes to LCCP algorithm to prepare it as a base for CPC.
Small corrections to existing code, too.


/** \brief Desribes if a connection is valid for the segment growing. Usually convex connections are and concave connection are not. Due to k-concavity a convex connection can be invalidated*/
bool is_valid;
bool used_for_cutting;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Missing description here. Also missing c in "Desribes" above.

@taketwo
Copy link
Member

taketwo commented Jul 29, 2015

Thanks! Looks good, please fix the small issues and I'll merge.

@mschoeler mschoeler force-pushed the LCCP_changes branch 2 times, most recently from 94eaee2 to 51bbcf7 Compare July 29, 2015 08:50
Small corrections to existing code, too.
@mschoeler
Copy link
Contributor Author

ok changed it in several locations with uint32_t.

Cheers

@mschoeler
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmh, do not know if this makes sense in all the locations I changed it. Maybe I can get your opinion on that :)

@taketwo
Copy link
Member

taketwo commented Jul 29, 2015

For me all of them make sense, at least this is exactly what I normally do myself :)

taketwo added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 29, 2015
@taketwo taketwo merged commit 0920162 into PointCloudLibrary:master Jul 29, 2015
@mschoeler mschoeler deleted the LCCP_changes branch July 29, 2015 12:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants