-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[CI] Use windows docker image in CI. #4426
Conversation
8930f12
to
43526be
Compare
Perhaps, add a dockerfile and a CI to build the image so you can use PCL's dockerhub to maintain the images |
Yeah, I'll do that when it works. Currently it fail to access |
f21d0c1
to
c60b511
Compare
So how do I go about updating the build YAML - should I add a new job as the windows container has to be build on a windows vmImage? |
Modify the .ci/azure-pipelines/env.yaml to add a new job (with windows as the pool's vmImage) to build the windows docker image. |
Marking this as stale due to 30 days of inactivity. Commenting or adding a new commit to the pull request will revert this. |
c60b511
to
5323808
Compare
5323808
to
a944154
Compare
463f978
to
1ad9414
Compare
e0af4b0
to
4b31468
Compare
4b31468
to
f2c2362
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Concerns due to move from Visual Studio 2017 to 2019:
- Is it because of the use of windows 2019 container OS?
- Is the 2019 version the "default" one used now? (I don't know how versions are maintained for VS)
- If we are dropping support for the older versions, we might want to check if we have some hacks for vs2017 or earlier
Rest LGTM.
We can finally compile visualization on Windows (in same time as before) 🎉 🥳
VS2019 seems also to be overrepresented in many of the relatively new opened windows issues. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks quite wonderful
@larshg Merge? |
Sound more reasonable? |
ac76e49
to
76cd5c8
Compare
Rebased and squashed a few commits. So should be fine to 🚀 when CI is green. |
No description provided.