Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor to improve (but not entirely fix) type hints #58

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

nikhilwoodruff
Copy link
Contributor

The existing type hints in simulation.py are incorrect. This attempts to fix them (And associated issues found while doing that), but I had to use # type:ignore in one place related to where we are trying to work on microsimulation and simulation in the same code even though only some of it applies to microsimulations.

Do not merge as-is, this commit is at-request to show current progress

Above is from @mikesmit- I'm opening it as a draft PR to more easily review. Thanks Mike!

The existing type hints in simulation.py are incorrect. This attempts to
fix them (And associated issues found while doing that), but I had to
use # type:ignore in one place related to where we are trying to work on
microsimulation and simulation in the same code even though only some of
it applies to microsimulations.

Do not merge as-is, this commit is at-request to show current progress
@nikhilwoodruff nikhilwoodruff marked this pull request as draft December 9, 2024 12:08
policyengine/simulation.py Show resolved Hide resolved
policyengine/simulation.py Show resolved Hide resolved
@nikhilwoodruff
Copy link
Contributor Author

Superseded by #62

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants