Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PowerShell adapter PR #363

Merged
merged 115 commits into from
Apr 12, 2024
Merged

Conversation

mgreenegit
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

dsc/tests/dsc_config_get.tests.ps1 Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
dsc/tests/dsc_get.tests.ps1 Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
dsc/tests/dsc_parameters.tests.ps1 Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
powershell-adapter/powershell.resource.ps1 Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
powershell-adapter/powershell.resource.ps1 Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
powershell-adapter/powershell.resource.ps1 Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
powershell-adapter/powershell.resource.ps1 Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
powershell-adapter/powershell.resource.ps1 Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@anmenaga
Copy link
Collaborator

Failing tests involve Binary resources.
I was under impression that we do not declare support for those in the fist version of upcoming release of DSC?
If that is the case, then these tests should be removed.

@mgreenegit
Copy link
Member Author

mgreenegit commented Apr 10, 2024 via email

@anmenaga
Copy link
Collaborator

The underlying reason is for v1, it needed to run winrm quickconfig. I don’t think we can do that within a build runner?

I don't see a technical problem with that; we can run anything within a build script;
However, the real question is - do we intend to declare support for old binary resources? That will require additional work (and we already have plenty with the need to remove script-based and class resources dependency on PSDesiredStateConfiguration module/PS DSC subsystem.

@mgreenegit
Copy link
Member Author

I didn’t know you could perform admin level actions. Thanks @anmenaga. Ready for review.

@mgreenegit
Copy link
Member Author

mgreenegit commented Apr 11, 2024 via email

@mgreenegit
Copy link
Member Author

Addressed all comments

@mgreenegit mgreenegit closed this Apr 12, 2024
@mgreenegit mgreenegit reopened this Apr 12, 2024
@SteveL-MSFT SteveL-MSFT added this pull request to the merge queue Apr 12, 2024
Merged via the queue into PowerShell:main with commit 079a90f Apr 12, 2024
6 of 7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants