Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

story #12867 : New descriptive field of vocabulary on Ontology #1902

Conversation

hazco75
Copy link
Contributor

@hazco75 hazco75 commented Jun 13, 2024

Description

Nouveau champ descriptif d'un vocabulaire dans l'ontologie

Type de changement

  • Nouveau Code

Documentation

Tests

Indiquer comment le code à été testé (manuel, environnement, TU, etc)

  • manuel
  • environnement
  • TU

Migration

Indiquer si les modifications apportées impliquent une migration sur l'existant et comment la faire

Checklist

Sélectionner les éléments de la checklist

  • Mon code suit le style de code de ce projet.
  • J'ai commenté mon code, en particulier dans les classes et les méthodes difficile à comprendre.
  • J'ai fait les changements correspondant dans la documentation RAML.
  • J'ai fait les changements correspondant dans la documentation Métier.
  • J'ai fait les changements correspondant dans la documentation Technique.
  • J'ai rajouté les tests unitaires vérifiant mes fonctionnalités.
  • J'ai rajouté les tests de non régression vérifiant mes fonctionnalités.
  • Les tests unitaires nouveaux et existants passent avec succès localement.
  • Toutes les dépendances ont été mergées en priorité

Contributeur

Indiquer qui a développé cette fonctionnalité

  • VAS (Vitam Accessible en Service)

@vitam-devops
Copy link
Collaborator

vitam-devops commented Jun 13, 2024

Logo
Checkmarx One – Scan Summary & Detailsbe4554f6-8c0d-4f65-b833-4845bd8d1870

New Issues

Severity Issue Source File / Package Checkmarx Insight
HIGH CVE-2019-15599 Npm-tree-kill-1.2.1 Vulnerable Package
HIGH CVE-2020-28502 Npm-xmlhttprequest-ssl-1.5.5 Vulnerable Package
HIGH CVE-2020-36048 Npm-engine.io-3.2.1 Vulnerable Package
HIGH CVE-2020-36049 Npm-socket.io-parser-3.2.0 Vulnerable Package
HIGH CVE-2020-7660 Npm-serialize-javascript-1.9.1 Vulnerable Package
HIGH CVE-2020-7788 Npm-ini-1.3.5 Vulnerable Package
HIGH CVE-2021-31597 Npm-xmlhttprequest-ssl-1.5.5 Vulnerable Package
HIGH CVE-2022-2421 Npm-socket.io-parser-3.2.0 Vulnerable Package
HIGH CVE-2023-45133 Npm-babel-traverse-6.26.0 Vulnerable Package
HIGH CVE-2024-37890 Npm-ws-8.11.0 Vulnerable Package
HIGH CVE-2024-37890 Npm-ws-3.3.3 Vulnerable Package
HIGH CVE-2024-37890 Npm-ws-6.2.2 Vulnerable Package
MEDIUM CVE-2019-16769 Npm-serialize-javascript-1.9.1 Vulnerable Package
MEDIUM CVE-2020-15366 Npm-ajv-6.10.0 Vulnerable Package
MEDIUM CVE-2020-15366 Npm-ajv-5.5.2 Vulnerable Package
MEDIUM CVE-2020-28481 Npm-socket.io-2.1.1 Vulnerable Package
MEDIUM CVE-2020-7693 Npm-sockjs-0.3.19 Vulnerable Package
MEDIUM CVE-2021-23364 Npm-browserslist-4.5.5 Vulnerable Package
MEDIUM CVE-2022-21704 Npm-log4js-4.5.1 Vulnerable Package
MEDIUM CVE-2022-41940 Npm-engine.io-3.2.1 Vulnerable Package
LOW Logging of Sensitive Data /ansible.cfg: [2](https://github.com/ProgrammeVitam/vitam-ui/blob/story_12867_new_descriptive_fields_of_a_vocabulary_on_ontology//deployment/pki/scripts/lib/ansible.cfg# L2) To keep sensitive values out of logs, tasks that expose them need to be marked defining 'no_log' and setting to True
LOW Logging of Sensitive Data /ansible.cfg: [2](https://github.com/ProgrammeVitam/vitam-ui/blob/story_12867_new_descriptive_fields_of_a_vocabulary_on_ontology//tools/docker/mongo/ansible.cfg# L2) To keep sensitive values out of logs, tasks that expose them need to be marked defining 'no_log' and setting to True
LOW Logging of Sensitive Data /ansible.cfg: [1](https://github.com/ProgrammeVitam/vitam-ui/blob/story_12867_new_descriptive_fields_of_a_vocabulary_on_ontology//deployment/ansible.cfg# L1) To keep sensitive values out of logs, tasks that expose them need to be marked defining 'no_log' and setting to True

@GiooDev GiooDev added this to the IT 137 milestone Jun 14, 2024
@hazco75 hazco75 force-pushed the story_12867_new_descriptive_fields_of_a_vocabulary_on_ontology branch 4 times, most recently from 66ea169 to 348db2f Compare June 17, 2024 08:38
@hazco75 hazco75 force-pushed the story_12867_new_descriptive_fields_of_a_vocabulary_on_ontology branch from 348db2f to 0152f02 Compare June 17, 2024 10:35
@hazco75 hazco75 force-pushed the story_12867_new_descriptive_fields_of_a_vocabulary_on_ontology branch from 0152f02 to 5287269 Compare June 17, 2024 12:23
@hazco75 hazco75 force-pushed the story_12867_new_descriptive_fields_of_a_vocabulary_on_ontology branch 2 times, most recently from abd8e4a to 213143c Compare June 17, 2024 14:03
@hazco75 hazco75 force-pushed the story_12867_new_descriptive_fields_of_a_vocabulary_on_ontology branch 2 times, most recently from ce8998b to 0c4dff5 Compare June 18, 2024 12:32
@hazco75 hazco75 force-pushed the story_12867_new_descriptive_fields_of_a_vocabulary_on_ontology branch from 0c4dff5 to 18d52e6 Compare June 18, 2024 16:51
@hazco75 hazco75 merged commit 2f28083 into develop Jun 19, 2024
8 checks passed
@hazco75 hazco75 deleted the story_12867_new_descriptive_fields_of_a_vocabulary_on_ontology branch June 19, 2024 08:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants