-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Penalize turns onto ways with restricted access: fees, customers #3745
Comments
@bhousel just mentioned we should do the same for |
Same with the toll=* tag (and related namespaced tags). Note there are "except" tags. Also fee tags. |
There are some implications on data size that I think are worthwhile for ignoring this road-class for now. |
|
Adding |
is there a way to make eg penalize left furn from primary & lanes > 1 to anything is duration+30 (looks like no: https://github.com/Project-OSRM/osrm-backend/blob/master/docs/profiles.md ) |
As you can see the turn object in the turn function does not know about tags anymore. but this got de-prioritized. Feel free to pick this up or help out here if it fits your needs. |
well, my C skills are really small. if the another use case is than in hiking routing, penalize turns from marked route to an unmarked path. or in car profile, add a small penalty when changing to lower class highways so that shortcuts through residential areas are avoided (even though they are not destination only) |
This issue seems to be stale. It will be closed in 30 days if no further activity occurs. |
In #3721 @karenzshea implemented a penalty for turns onto restricted ways (think destination routing, hov ways, etc.). This makes sure we prefer alternative routes but we can still route you there if you really want to go there.
There is currently a discussion going on about zoos and other areas where customers have acces and / or you have to pay a fee for entry.
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-de/2017-February/113797.html
It would be great to support those tags (and maybe more?) in the same way.
cc @karenzshea
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: