-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add polygon outlines to labelmap and user dashboard #2085
Comments
@misaugstad. I have been playing around with different border weights and opacities and thought I would post them here to see which ones we want to use. I made the border weight the same weight as the black lines drawn for the streets on the label map (3). With border opacity 0.25, you can see how the border gets darker in some areas where multiple borders overlap, one solution setting the border opacity equal to 1. I included a picture of this on the user dashboard, but the bright red looks a little out of place. user dashboard before: Let me know which type of styling we want to use for the borders. |
Nice work! Can your try light or dark gray with ~70-80% opacity (yes, I
realize these look similar to roads, so make sure line widths are skinnier
for borders). Also, try dashed lines.
…On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 12:43 PM Matthew Johnson ***@***.***> wrote:
I have been playing around with different border weights and opacities and
thought I would post them here to see which ones we want to use. I made the
border weight the same weight as the black lines drawn for the streets on
the label map. With border opacity 0.25, you can see how the border gets
darker in some areas where multiple borders overlap, one solution setting
the border opacity equal to 1. I included a picture of this on the user
dashboard, but the bright red looks a little out of place.
user dashboard before:
[image: userdashbefore]
<https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/32688680/85930677-34836e80-b873-11ea-9c33-fa96d0698117.jpg>
user dashboard after:
[image: userdashafter]
<https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/32688680/85930681-3d744000-b873-11ea-8b3f-68ede34b5bca.jpg>
user dashboard with border opacity = 1
[image: opacity=1]
<https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/32688680/85930742-bbd0e200-b873-11ea-942a-0fcbba3aa990.jpg>
label map before:
[image: labelmapbefore]
<https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/32688680/85930687-4c5af280-b873-11ea-859c-e10c5ff3e9e9.jpg>
label map after:
[image: labelmapafter]
<https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/32688680/85930690-541a9700-b873-11ea-8e3a-6bfb587a34e6.jpg>
Let me know which type of styling we want to use for the borders.
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#2085 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAML55JEGSQR4K7MR7EMWU3RYZDW7ANCNFSM4MWWPCJA>
.
--
Jon Froehlich
Associate Professor
Paul G. Allen School of Computer Science & Engineering
University of Washington
http://makeabilitylab.io
@jonfroehlich <https://twitter.com/jonfroehlich> - Twitter
Help make sidewalks more accessible: http://projectsidewalk.io
|
color #888, 80% opacity, width 2, dash length = 5 user dashboard: |
I think that in addition to the outline, it might be useful to have some sort of low opacity coloring of the neighborhoods. |
Yeah something like that. I'd like to see it on a noisier map with labels too |
Yeah I like that a lot better. It's much easier to see where the city is this way. |
Me too. I like the lighter gray versions... not sure about dashed vs. solid line borders. Thoughts? |
I think I prefer the solid lines, but I like both! |
…utline #2085 Add dark polygon outline and gray overlay to neighborhoods
closing via #2156 |
The maps on the user dashboard and the Label Map don't have polygon outlines for the neighborhoods which makes it hard to see what's really going on. This is especially true if there is not much data, or the neighborhoods we are auditing are not connected (like in Mexico City).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: