Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(bridgecall): implement pre-compilation for ibc transfer #729

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 11, 2024

Conversation

zakir-code
Copy link
Contributor

@zakir-code zakir-code commented Oct 11, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced cross-chain handling and bridge call processes for improved efficiency.
    • Introduced a new method for managing bridge calls, ensuring better validation and routing.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Corrected naming conventions in method signatures to ensure consistency across the application.
  • Refactor

    • Streamlined error handling and routing logic in bridge call methods.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 11, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve significant updates to the bridge call and cross-chain handling logic across several files. Key modifications include restructuring methods for better error handling and routing, introducing new methods for managing bridge calls, and correcting type imports for consistency. The method signatures have been updated to reflect these changes, enhancing the functionality and clarity of the bridge call processes.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
x/crosschain/precompile/bridge_call.go Updated BridgeCallMethod structure and methods, including Run and PackOutput, for improved routing and error handling.
x/crosschain/precompile/keeper.go Enhanced Keeper struct with updated return types for handlerCrossChain and ibcTransfer, and added handlerBridgeCall.
x/crosschain/types/expected_keepers.go Corrected import from tranfsertypes to transfertypes, updating method signatures in IBCTransferKeeper interface.

Possibly related PRs

🐇 In the meadow, where bunnies play,
New bridge calls hop in a joyful way.
With routing refined and errors tamed,
Cross-chain magic is now proclaimed!
So let us leap and dance with glee,
For smoother paths, we now can see! 🌼✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 7

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
x/crosschain/precompile/bridge_call.go (1)

Line range hint 109-109: Correct typo in parameter name nonceNonce

The parameter name nonceNonce in the PackOutput function appears to be a typo. For clarity and consistency, consider renaming it to eventNonce.

Apply this diff to correct the parameter name:

-func (m *BridgeCallMethod) PackOutput(nonceNonce *big.Int) ([]byte, error) {
+func (m *BridgeCallMethod) PackOutput(eventNonce *big.Int) ([]byte, error) {
	return m.Method.Outputs.Pack(
-		nonceNonce)
+		eventNonce)
}
x/crosschain/precompile/keeper.go (1)

228-228: Address the TODO: Record origin amount

There's a TODO comment indicating the need to record the origin amount. Implementing this is crucial for accurate tracking and processing of bridge calls.

Would you like assistance in implementing this functionality, or should I open a GitHub issue to ensure it is tracked and addressed?

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between ebd652f and f27bf64.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • x/crosschain/precompile/bridge_call.go (2 hunks)
  • x/crosschain/precompile/keeper.go (3 hunks)
  • x/crosschain/types/expected_keepers.go (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (2)
x/crosschain/types/expected_keepers.go (2)

76-78: Approve interface updates and suggest implementation check.

The IBCTransferKeeper interface has been correctly updated to use the transfertypes package instead of the misspelled tranfsertypes. This change ensures consistency with the import statement and improves code correctness.

To ensure the interface implementation has been updated accordingly, please run the following command:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation of IBCTransferKeeper interface.

# Test: Search for the struct that implements IBCTransferKeeper. Expect: The implementation using the new types.
ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'type $_ struct {
  $$$
}

func (k $_) Transfer(ctx context.Context, msg *transfertypes.MsgTransfer) (*transfertypes.MsgTransferResponse, error) {
  $$$
}

func (k $_) SetDenomTrace(ctx sdk.Context, denomTrace transfertypes.DenomTrace) {
  $$$
}

func (k $_) GetDenomTrace(ctx sdk.Context, denomTraceHash tmbytes.HexBytes) (transfertypes.DenomTrace, bool) {
  $$$
}'

12-12: Approve import correction and suggest verification.

The import statement has been correctly updated to fix the typographical error in the package name. This change improves code consistency and correctness.

To ensure all occurrences have been updated, please run the following command:

✅ Verification successful

Import correction verified successfully.

All instances of the old package name tranfsertypes have been removed.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all occurrences of the old package name have been updated.

# Test: Search for any remaining instances of 'tranfsertypes'. Expect: No results.
rg --type go 'tranfsertypes'

Length of output: 1184

x/crosschain/precompile/bridge_call.go Show resolved Hide resolved
x/crosschain/precompile/bridge_call.go Show resolved Hide resolved
x/crosschain/precompile/keeper.go Show resolved Hide resolved
x/crosschain/precompile/keeper.go Show resolved Hide resolved
x/crosschain/precompile/keeper.go Show resolved Hide resolved
x/crosschain/precompile/keeper.go Show resolved Hide resolved
x/crosschain/precompile/keeper.go Show resolved Hide resolved
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants