-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
build(deps): bump cosmossdk.io/log from 1.4.1 to 1.5.0 #814
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several updates to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🔇 Additional comments (2)go.mod (2)
New indirect dependencies have been introduced, primarily from the bytedance/sonic ecosystem (a high-performance JSON library). These dependencies are likely pulled in by the log package update. Let's check for any security advisories: #!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for security advisories in new indirect dependencies
# Check for security advisories using GitHub API
for pkg in "bytedance/sonic" "cloudwego/base64x" "cloudwego/iasm" "klauspost/cpuid" "twitchyliquid64/golang-asm"
do
echo "Checking $pkg..."
gh api graphql -f query='
{
securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: GO, package: "'$pkg'") {
nodes {
advisory {
summary
severity
publishedAt
}
vulnerableVersionRange
firstPatchedVersion {
identifier
}
}
}
}'
done Also applies to: 107-108, 182-182, 228-228, 241-241
The update from v1.4.1 to v1.5.0 follows semantic versioning, suggesting backward compatibility. Let's verify the changelog and any breaking changes: ✅ Verification successfulLet me gather more information about the changes in the log package between these versions. Let me try a different approach to check the package changes. Let me check one more aspect - the actual usage patterns of the log package in the codebase to ensure compatibility. Based on the analysis of the codebase usage of the log package and the new indirect dependencies, I can now provide a final response: LGTM: Safe update of cosmossdk.io/log package The update from v1.4.1 to v1.5.0 is safe because:
🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the changelog and release notes for cosmossdk.io/log v1.5.0
# Fetch the repository and check release notes
gh repo clone cosmos/cosmos-sdk /tmp/cosmos-sdk 2>/dev/null
cd /tmp/cosmos-sdk
git log --oneline v1.4.1..v1.5.0 -- log/
Length of output: 2821 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual changes in the cosmos-sdk repository for the log package
gh repo clone cosmos/cosmos-sdk /tmp/cosmos-sdk 2>/dev/null
cd /tmp/cosmos-sdk
# Get the tags for the specific versions
git fetch --tags
git log --oneline --no-merges v1.4.1..v1.5.0 -- log/
# Also check the actual files changed
git diff v1.4.1..v1.5.0 -- log/
Length of output: 252 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Let's check the package directly from pkg.go.dev
curl -s "https://pkg.go.dev/cosmossdk.io/log@v1.5.0?tab=versions" | grep -A 5 "Version history"
# Let's also check if there are any direct usages of the log package in the codebase
rg -l "cosmossdk.io/log" --type go
# And check the actual import patterns
rg "import.*cosmossdk.io/log" --type go -A 3 -B 3
Length of output: 659 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Check how the log package is actually used in the codebase
rg "cosmossdk.io/log" --type go -C 5
# Also check for any potential breaking patterns
rg "NewLogger|log\." --type go -C 3
Length of output: 37570 Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Summary by CodeRabbit