Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ffi cleanup: methodobject to moduleobject #1425
ffi cleanup: methodobject to moduleobject #1425
Changes from 2 commits
d84d0de
d34856b
b35a6a5
aaddb20
1c845e7
96fcfe6
39a29a5
2d7d482
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This definition
PyCFunction_Check
is the same as the newPyCFunction_CheckExact
- does it need updating?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oops, thanks. Looks like this one was renamed in Python 3.9, with the new definition of
PyCFunction_Check
usingPyObject_TypeCheck
. Updated.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks like 3.9 introduced the
Py_IS_TYPE
macro inobject.h
, which I'll add -- should help catch these changes when eyeballingThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This would be breaking, but I guess the only user is
pyclass.rs
and we can remove this.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Agreed, as I think we're going to do a breaking release next anyway it's fine to just scrap this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@davidhewitt You'll do this in #1426 or should I add to this PR?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think probably simpler for you to do it in this PR so there's no risk of merge conflicts.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actually nvm, I see that other than that, this PR is ready to go. I'll merge this PR now and do it in #1426.