-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 794
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
mangle exported functions for PyPy #3040
Conversation
I think the existing news fragment is sufficient. Thanks! bors r+ |
3040: mangle exported functions for PyPy r=adamreichold a=mattip Continuation of #3031. This [turned up](https://github.com/pypy/binary-testing/actions/runs/4390086363/jobs/7688256133#step:6:179) in the run of PyPy 3.10 HEAD against PyO3 HEAD. Should I add a new news fragment or is the one from #3031 sufficient? Co-authored-by: Matti Picus <matti.picus@gmail.com>
Build failed: |
@mattip Could you have a look at the build failure in https://github.com/PyO3/pyo3/actions/runs/4396220835/jobs/7698525481 ? Does this need a version limit? |
Yes, there should be a version guard. Only PyPy3.10 mangles the name of |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry I had a pending review comment, just posted - we can do #[cfg_attr(all(PyPy, Py_3_10), ...)]
Co-authored-by: David Hewitt <1939362+davidhewitt@users.noreply.github.com>
bors retry |
Build succeeded: |
Continuation of #3031. This turned up in the run of PyPy 3.10 HEAD against PyO3 HEAD. Should I add a new news fragment or is the one from #3031 sufficient?