Reformulate co2 constraint #862
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
fneum
approved these changes
Jan 18, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Works like charm @lisazeyen!
I double-checked that the objective value and shadow prices are the same.
Performance was about the same for a 100-second model.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes # (if applicable).
Change CO2 emission constraint for sector coupled models
Instead of using the
primary_energyglobal constraint formulation this PR puts a constraint on the last snapshot of the co2 atmosphere bus.TODO: haven't tested yet if performance improves for overnight scenarios
Checklist
envs/environment.yaml.config.default.yaml.doc/configtables/*.csv.doc/release_notes.rstis added.