-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 85
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Revert changes from issue #190 after server changes are made #582
Labels
Comments
@abbycross @beckykd This is no longer blocked. |
@abbycross, I'm in the process of updating all of the session docs right now, so I can just make this change with that PR. |
1 task
github-merge-queue bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 29, 2024
Closes #595 Closes #1041 Closes #582 Closes #780 Closes #582 Closes #1156 Closes #577 Closes #576 - [x] Add text about job splitting, such as "If you split your workload into multiple jobs and run them in Batch mode, you can get results from individual jobs. You can, for example, decide to cancel the rest of the jobs if the earlier job results don't meet your expectations. If one of the jobs fail, you can also re-submit just that one instead of re-running the entire workload." There are several new and existing topics that are impacted: - This documentation section has several topics about execution modes: https://qiskit-docs-preview-pr-783.1799mxdls7qz.us-south.codeengine.appdomain.cloud/run/execution-modes - This migration guide is new: https://qiskit-docs-preview-pr-783.1799mxdls7qz.us-south.codeengine.appdomain.cloud/api/migration-guides/sessions --------- Co-authored-by: Ashley Silva <asarver1@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Jessie Yu <jessieyu@us.ibm.com> Co-authored-by: abbycross <across@us.ibm.com>
frankharkins
pushed a commit
to frankharkins/documentation
that referenced
this issue
Jul 22, 2024
Closes Qiskit#595 Closes Qiskit#1041 Closes Qiskit#582 Closes Qiskit#780 Closes Qiskit#582 Closes Qiskit#1156 Closes Qiskit#577 Closes Qiskit#576 - [x] Add text about job splitting, such as "If you split your workload into multiple jobs and run them in Batch mode, you can get results from individual jobs. You can, for example, decide to cancel the rest of the jobs if the earlier job results don't meet your expectations. If one of the jobs fail, you can also re-submit just that one instead of re-running the entire workload." There are several new and existing topics that are impacted: - This documentation section has several topics about execution modes: https://qiskit-docs-preview-pr-783.1799mxdls7qz.us-south.codeengine.appdomain.cloud/run/execution-modes - This migration guide is new: https://qiskit-docs-preview-pr-783.1799mxdls7qz.us-south.codeengine.appdomain.cloud/api/migration-guides/sessions --------- Co-authored-by: Ashley Silva <asarver1@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Jessie Yu <jessieyu@us.ibm.com> Co-authored-by: abbycross <across@us.ibm.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
URL, if applicable
https://docs.quantum.ibm.com/run/run-jobs-in-session#open-a-session for this part:
https://docs.quantum.ibm.com/run/run-jobs-in-session#close-a-session for this part:
Describe the new content you are requesting.
The pay-go cloud channel and quantum (IQP) channel server side behaviors are going to change such that the docs changes for issue #190 can be reverted once the server side changes are in production for both channels.
With epic Decouple session from root job the API is going to support explicitly creating a session rather than implicitly with the first job in the session such that the first (root) job and session have the same ID. With that decoupling we'll be able to revert the previous change where we would close the session and fail any remaining queued jobs, so we won't need those notes in the docs anymore.
I'm not sure if a qiskit-ibm-runtime issue exists for this yet, but eventually that code will need to change to create the session explicitly for batch mode support.
This issue is a placeholder to make sure we don't forget about the docs updates, but again don't make these until we've confirmed that the server sides changes in both channels is in production.
If this new content request is accepted, do you want to write the content?
I can help the team by providing enough information to write the material
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: