-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 85
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Updating docs for qiskit-transpiler-service #1435
Updating docs for qiskit-transpiler-service #1435
Conversation
One or more of the following people are relevant to this code: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks!
from qiskit.circuit.library import EfficientSU2 | ||
from qiskit_transpiler_service.transpiler_service import TranspilerService | ||
|
||
circuit = EfficientSU2(101, entanglement="circular", reps=1).decompose() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is there a simpler circuit you can use? With examples, it's useful to keep simple the less relevant details. Here, we only want to express that we have a QuantumCircuit
.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I do agree we could do it with any QuantumCircuit
, yet we want to showcase from the beginning this works for big circuits, that's the reason for that particular one
Co-authored-by: Eric Arellano <14852634+Eric-Arellano@users.noreply.github.com>
…qiskit-transpiler-service-docs
Co-authored-by: Rebecca Dimock <66339736+beckykd@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Eric Arellano <14852634+Eric-Arellano@users.noreply.github.com>
@cbjuan I've invited you with write access. You can merge this when you're ready, and then I'll deploy the docs. |
Thank you @Eric-Arellano! Merging |
Sorry - I'm just back from being out sick and want to give this a pass. Will merge asap I promise! I wonder if we should be saying "AI-powered synthesis passes" rather than "AI synthesis passes", per @JulesMurphy 's caution not to leave AI unmodified -- thoughts??? |
Yes, that's right @abbycross. In general we should say always AI-powered. Thanks for the suggestion and for jumping in right on time :) |
Co-authored-by: abbycross <across@us.ibm.com>
Updating the documentation to reflect some of the changes we've implemented for the beta version of the service and to include citation reference --------- Co-authored-by: Eric Arellano <14852634+Eric-Arellano@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Rebecca Dimock <66339736+beckykd@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: abbycross <across@us.ibm.com>
…iskit#1458) In Qiskit#1435 I did not update the status of the Qiskit transpiler service from "alpha" to "beta". This PR fixes it --------- Co-authored-by: abbycross <across@us.ibm.com>
Updating the documentation to reflect some of the changes we've implemented for the beta version of the service and to include citation reference