Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Correct operator ordering #1480

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 3, 2024
Merged

Conversation

shraddha-aangiras
Copy link
Contributor

This fixes #1477 with the correct ordering of operators

@qiskit-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for contributing to Qiskit documentation!

Before your PR can be merged, it will first need to pass continuous integration tests and be reviewed. Sometimes the review process can be slow, so please be patient. Thanks! 🙌

One or more of the following people are relevant to this code:

Copy link

Check out this pull request on  ReviewNB

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.


Powered by ReviewNB

@kaelynj kaelynj self-requested a review June 3, 2024 13:33
Copy link
Collaborator

@kaelynj kaelynj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks good to me. Thanks for the PR! 🚀

@Eric-Arellano Eric-Arellano merged commit c8c3407 into Qiskit:main Jun 3, 2024
4 of 5 checks passed
frankharkins pushed a commit to frankharkins/documentation that referenced this pull request Jul 22, 2024
This fixes Qiskit#1477 with the correct ordering of operators
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Incorrect operator ordering
4 participants