Acceptance Criteria for Authentication Epic

[rathishcholarajan]

Summary

I've added acceptance criteria for the Runtime 0.1 - Authentication #2 epic. Will update this file for other epics in separate PRs.

Details and comments

Fixes #

[daka1510]

Thanks for writing this up. Matches my understanding. Looks good.

[jyu00]

Questions about save_account

1. The examples only show save_account with instance explicitly specified. Presumably that parameter is optional?
2. For legacy runtime, save_account(instance="hgp1") means hgp1 will be the default h/g/p to use, right? But the actual h/g/p used is inferred from the backend selected (e.g. if I want to run on backend1 which is only accessible under hgp2, not hgp1, hgp2 will be used?
3. Similar to above, except for cloud runtime, whatever instance I've saved will always be used?
4. If I do save_account() for a name that already exists but with different values (e.g. different instance), it'd essentially update that entry?
5. IBMRuntimeService() will use legacy, not cloud, account if I only have legacy account saved, right?

[rathishcholarajan]

Questions about save_account

1. The examples only show save_account with instance explicitly specified. Presumably that parameter is optional?

Yes it’s optional. Will add another example.

2. For legacy runtime, save_account(instance="hgp1") means hgp1 will be the default h/g/p to use, right? But the actual h/g/p used is inferred from the backend selected (e.g. if I want to run on backend1 which is only accessible under hgp2, not hgp1, hgp2 will be used?

Correct. I’ll make a note about it.

3. Similar to above, except for cloud runtime, whatever instance I've saved will always be used?

Correct.

4. If I do save_account() for a name that already exists but with different values (e.g. different instance), it'd essentially update that entry?

Correct. Will mention that with an example.

5. IBMRuntimeService() will use legacy, not cloud, account if I only have legacy account saved, right?

Correct. Will add an example.

[daka1510]

Looks good from my side. We can run another sanity check once this PR and #66 are integrated.