Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 19, 2023. It is now read-only.

Add overall transpilation time bench with scheduling #1441

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 11, 2022

Conversation

itoko
Copy link
Contributor

@itoko itoko commented Mar 4, 2022

Summary

Add a benchmark to track the overall time performance of circuit scheduling, which would be near to that end users actually experience when scheduling.

Details and comments

Follow-up PR of #1421. As suggested in the original PR, optimization level 0 and 1 are added so that it would not take so much time while covering the places where people are doing scheduling.

@mtreinish mtreinish merged commit 285a3fd into Qiskit:master Mar 11, 2022
@itoko itoko deleted the add-overall-circuit-scheduling-bench branch March 11, 2022 22:39
jakelishman pushed a commit to jakelishman/qiskit-terra that referenced this pull request Aug 1, 2023
…etapackage#1441)

Add a benchmark to track the overall time performance of circuit
scheduling, which would be near to that end users actually
experience when scheduling.

Follow-up PR of Qiskit/qiskit-metapackage#1421. As suggested in the original PR,
optimization level 0 and 1 are added so that it would not take so
much time while covering the places where people are doing
scheduling.

* Add overall transpilation time bench with scheduling

* Improve a bit
jakelishman pushed a commit to jakelishman/qiskit-terra that referenced this pull request Aug 11, 2023
…etapackage#1441)

Add a benchmark to track the overall time performance of circuit
scheduling, which would be near to that end users actually
experience when scheduling.

Follow-up PR of Qiskit/qiskit-metapackage#1421. As suggested in the original PR,
optimization level 0 and 1 are added so that it would not take so
much time while covering the places where people are doing
scheduling.

* Add overall transpilation time bench with scheduling

* Improve a bit
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants