-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix a transpile issue of BackendSampler #9236
Conversation
Thank you for opening a new pull request. Before your PR can be merged it will first need to pass continuous integration tests and be reviewed. Sometimes the review process can be slow, so please be patient. While you're waiting, please feel free to review other open PRs. While only a subset of people are authorized to approve pull requests for merging, everyone is encouraged to review open pull requests. Doing reviews helps reduce the burden on the core team and helps make the project's code better for everyone. One or more of the the following people are requested to review this:
|
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 3628568741
💛 - Coveralls |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you. Good catch! LGTM
@t-imamichi Could you write the release note, please? |
This PR is straightforward and it transpiles all circuits even if some of them are already transpiled in the past. Do you think we need to optimize the transpilation? |
I made an optimized version t-imamichi/qiskit-terra@fix-backend-sampler...t-imamichi:qiskit-terra:fix-bs2 |
I'm fine with both. I optimized the transpiration in Aer. But, skip_transpilation may be exposed to public in the future. |
If AerSampler does the optimization, it seems good to do it for |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
* fix an issue of transpile of BackendSampler * optimize * add reno * updated test Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> (cherry picked from commit cc28f82)
* fix an issue of transpile of BackendSampler * optimize * add reno * updated test Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> (cherry picked from commit cc28f82) Co-authored-by: Takashi Imamichi <31178928+t-imamichi@users.noreply.github.com>
* fix an issue of transpile of BackendSampler * optimize * add reno * updated test Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Summary
BackendSampler
raises an error if tworun
s are called sequentially as follows. This PR fixes the issue.This PR is straightforward. So, it might be better to skip circuits that are already transpiled.
output
Details and comments