Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix non-complex dtypes in OneQubitEulerDecomposer methods (backport #9828) #9829

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 20, 2023

Conversation

mergify[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@mergify mergify bot commented Mar 20, 2023

This is an automatic backport of pull request #9828 done by Mergify.


Mergify commands and options

More conditions and actions can be found in the documentation.

You can also trigger Mergify actions by commenting on this pull request:

  • @Mergifyio refresh will re-evaluate the rules
  • @Mergifyio rebase will rebase this PR on its base branch
  • @Mergifyio update will merge the base branch into this PR
  • @Mergifyio backport <destination> will backport this PR on <destination> branch

Additionally, on Mergify dashboard you can:

  • look at your merge queues
  • generate the Mergify configuration with the config editor.

Finally, you can contact us on https://mergify.com

* Fix non-complex dtypes in OneQubitEulerDecomposer methods

This commit fixes a regression introduced in the rewrite of the
internals of the OneQubitEulerDecomposer class to be in rust. Previously
the angles() and angles_and_phase() methods of OneQubitEulerDecomposer
would work with a non-complex dtype in the input, however because the
rust component of the module is strictly typed to only work with a
complex128 dtype passing the array to rust to compute the angles and
phase of the unitary would fail. To address this limitation this commit
casts the input matrix to be complex before passing it to the rust
function.

Fixes #9827

* Cleanup release note

* Update test/python/quantum_info/test_synthesis.py

Co-authored-by: Jake Lishman <jake@binhbar.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Jake Lishman <jake@binhbar.com>
(cherry picked from commit 6cec912)
@qiskit-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Thank you for opening a new pull request.

Before your PR can be merged it will first need to pass continuous integration tests and be reviewed. Sometimes the review process can be slow, so please be patient.

While you're waiting, please feel free to review other open PRs. While only a subset of people are authorized to approve pull requests for merging, everyone is encouraged to review open pull requests. Doing reviews helps reduce the burden on the core team and helps make the project's code better for everyone.

One or more of the the following people are requested to review this:

@mtreinish mtreinish added Changelog: Bugfix Include in the "Fixed" section of the changelog automerge and removed automerge labels Mar 20, 2023
@mtreinish mtreinish added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 20, 2023
@mtreinish mtreinish merged commit 36807d1 into stable/0.23 Mar 20, 2023
@mergify mergify bot deleted the mergify/bp/stable/0.23/pr-9828 branch March 20, 2023 20:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Changelog: Bugfix Include in the "Fixed" section of the changelog
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants