Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

BUG: Fix simplex_grid #193

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 25, 2017
Merged

BUG: Fix simplex_grid #193

merged 2 commits into from
Nov 25, 2017

Conversation

oyamad
Copy link
Member

@oyamad oyamad commented Nov 25, 2017

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Nov 25, 2017

Codecov Report

Merging #193 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #193   +/-   ##
======================================
  Coverage    90.8%   90.8%           
======================================
  Files          24      24           
  Lines        1631    1631           
======================================
  Hits         1481    1481           
  Misses        150     150
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/util.jl 95.65% <100%> (ø) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 0a08dc2...acf57be. Read the comment docs.

@oyamad oyamad requested a review from cc7768 November 25, 2017 09:07
@sglyon sglyon merged commit bc5fe7a into master Nov 25, 2017
@oyamad oyamad deleted the fix_simplex_grid branch November 25, 2017 15:03
oyamad referenced this pull request in QuantEcon/GameTheory.jl Nov 25, 2017
@@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ function simplex_grid(m, n)
x[m] = val - 1
x[h] += 1

copy!(out, 3*(i-1) + 1, x, 1, m)
copy!(out, m*(i-1) + 1, x, 1, m)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ooops. Good catch.

Thanks for fixing this!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants