Revert "Revert "feat: remove private prompts on related brain delete""

[StanGirard]

Reverts #870

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Updated (UTC)
docs	🔄 Building (Inspect)	Visit Preview	Aug 7, 2023 8:15am
quivrapp	🔄 Building (Inspect)	Visit Preview	Aug 7, 2023 8:15am

[github-actions]

LOGAF Level 1 - /home/runner/work/quivr/quivr/frontend/app/brains-management/[brainId]/components/BrainManagementTabs/components/SettingsTab/components/PublicPrompts/PublicPrompts.tsx

1. The PublicPrompts component is quite simple and doesn't have any major issues. However, the onSelect prop could be better named to indicate what it does. Consider renaming it to something more descriptive, like onPromptSelected.

Example:

// Instead of this
onSelect: ({ title, content }: { title: string; content: string }) => void;
// Do this
onPromptSelected: ({ title, content }: { title: string; content: string }) => void;

---

LOGAF Level 3 - /home/runner/work/quivr/quivr/backend/core/routes/subscription_routes.py

1. The code is generally well-written and follows good practices. However, there are some areas where it could be improved for readability and maintainability.

2. The invite_users_to_brain function is quite long and does a lot of things. Consider breaking it down into smaller, more manageable functions. This will make the code easier to read and maintain.

3. The error handling in this function could also be improved. Instead of raising an HTTPException for each error, consider using a more structured approach to error handling. This could involve defining custom exception classes for different types of errors and using these throughout your code.

4. The get_brain_users function could be optimized by fetching user emails concurrently. This could potentially improve the performance of this function.

5. The remove_user_subscription function is also quite long and complex. Consider breaking it down into smaller functions to improve readability and maintainability.

6. The update_brain_subscription function has a lot of nested if-else statements. This makes the function hard to read and understand. Consider refactoring this function to reduce its complexity.

Example:

# Instead of this
if condition1:
    if condition2:
        # do something
    else:
        # do something else
# Do this
if condition1 and condition2:
    # do something
elif condition1 and not condition2:
    # do something else

---

LOGAF Level 2 - /home/runner/work/quivr/quivr/frontend/app/brains-management/[brainId]/components/BrainManagementTabs/components/SettingsTab/SettingsTab.tsx

1. The SettingsTab component is quite large and does a lot of things. Consider breaking it down into smaller, more manageable components. This will make the code easier to read and maintain.

2. The handleSubmit function is called with void. This is not a common practice in JavaScript and can be confusing for other developers. Consider removing the void keyword.

3. The isDefaultBrain ternary operation could be simplified for better readability.

Example:

// Instead of this
{isDefaultBrain ? (
    <div>Default brain</div>
) : (
    <Button>Set as default brain</Button>
)}
// Do this
{isDefaultBrain ? <div>Default brain</div> : <Button>Set as default brain</Button>}

---

🔍🔧📚

---

Powered by Code Review GPT