Infixowl fix

[ghost]

Summary of changes

• added example of ontology creation using infixowl syntax
• updated infixowl tests
• added _rdfList class variable
• fixed cardinality issue
• fixed Callable issue
• added documentation of operator mapping
• robustified return of string
• modernized OWLRDFListProxy class def
• added documentation to IIndividual
• renamed Individual.serialize to Individual.snc (subject node closure)
• added Individual.bnc (blank node closure)
• changed to use @ throughout as infix operator
• tidied # docstring syntax
• replaced antiquated namespace_manager bindings with moderm graph ns bindings.

Checklist

• Checked that there aren't other open pull requests for the same change.
• Added tests for any changes that have a runtime impact.
• Checked that all tests and type checking passes.
• For changes that have a potential impact on users of this project:
  • Updated relevant documentation to avoid inaccuracies.
  • Considered adding additional documentation.
  • Considered adding an example in ./examples for new features.
  • Considered updating our changelog (CHANGELOG.md).
• Considered granting push permissions to the PR branch,
  so maintainers can fix minor issues and keep your PR up to date.

[coveralls]

Coverage: 90.824% (-0.03%) from 90.85% when pulling 8ca2dc5 on gjhiggins:infixowl-fix into ddcc4eb on RDFLib:main.

[aucampia]

@gjhiggins looks good with some minor comments. I'm happy to address them in your branch.

[aucampia]

@gjhiggins looks good with some minor comments. I'm happy to address them in your branch.

@gjhiggins just a follow up on this, I will update your branch accordingly this weekend if there are no objections.

[aucampia]

Sorry for the accidental close

[ghost]

@gjhiggins looks good with some minor comments. I'm happy to address them in your branch.

@gjhiggins just a follow up on this, I will update your branch accordingly this weekend if there are no objections.

Sure, no problem, thank you.

[ghost]

Mm. Wonder why 3.11 is failing on

rdflib/test/test_graph/test_graph.py

Line 347 in cbd6151

graph.parse(location="http://www.w3.org/ns/adms.ttl")

[aucampia]

Mm. Wonder why 3.11 is failing on

rdflib/test/test_graph/test_graph.py

Line 347 in cbd6151

graph.parse(location="http://www.w3.org/ns/adms.ttl")

This is unrelated to this PR.

[aucampia]

Mm. Wonder why 3.11 is failing on

rdflib/test/test_graph/test_graph.py

Line 347 in cbd6151

graph.parse(location="http://www.w3.org/ns/adms.ttl")

This is unrelated to this PR.

I figured it out:

• HTTP 308 handling does not correctly change Host header in request. #2382

Looking at a way to fix it now.

[aucampia]

@gjhiggins this now only contains changes for the node closure function additions as the rest was merged in #2390

[ghost]

@gjhiggins this now only contains changes for the node closure function additions as the rest was merged in #2390

Noted, thanks. Bizarrely, GH still reporting that the branch in my clone repos is 22 commits ahead, sigh.

[aucampia]

Noted, thanks. Bizarrely, GH still reporting that the branch in my clone repos is 22 commits ahead, sigh.

If you do a rebase, that should possibly improve. A squash using git rebase --interactive upstream/main may also make sense.

[ghost]

Noted, thanks. Bizarrely, GH still reporting that the branch in my clone repos is 22 commits ahead, sigh.

If you do a rebase, that should possibly improve. A squash using git rebase --interactive upstream/main may also make sense.

Thanks for the advice but sadly, I'm lost in my ignorance of git at this point, will have to find time to spend on understanding how rebase and squash work.

[ghost]

Thanks for the advice

Something profoundly amiss, can't recover a sane branch, I'm closing this PR, will delete the problematic branch and will raise another PR once I've created some tests.