Full test data test for unsupervised and hybrid

[zargham-ahmad]

This PR includes the following:

• added full test data case for unsupervised Implement tests with proper test data for unsupervised method #69
• added full test data case for hybrid Implement tests with full test data set for hybrid method #58
• fixed parameter bug of recover.weaker in unsupervised and hybrid sample_intensities double length in recover.weaker #174
• added function to sort data in compute_clusters to return sorted data compute_clusters returns unordered file data #175
• updated remote files

closes #69 closes #58 closes #174 closes #175

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Base: 65.63% // Head: 66.29% // Increases project coverage by +0.65% 🎉

Coverage data is based on head (8158221) compared to base (aa11247).
Patch coverage: 100.00% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #177      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   65.63%   66.29%   +0.65%     
==========================================
  Files          23       23              
  Lines        2590     2602      +12     
==========================================
+ Hits         1700     1725      +25     
+ Misses        890      877      -13     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
R/compute_clusters.R	81.63% <100.00%> (+3.06%)	⬆️
R/hybrid.R	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
R/recover.weaker.R	98.31% <100.00%> (+4.41%)	⬆️
R/unsupervised.R	99.28% <100.00%> (+0.01%)	⬆️
R/utils.R	88.88% <100.00%> (-0.16%)	⬇️

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[maximskorik]

Looks good! I'd only rename that skip variable so that if someone reads that code, they know what it's for without looking into the test implementation.

[xtrojak]

Overall good job, thank you for this @zargham-ahmad !

[hechth]

Looks good - do you agree @xtrojak ?

@zargham-ahmad could you only add the changes to the changelog?