Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

slice /per-rule non-sequentially #166

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 26, 2024
Merged

slice /per-rule non-sequentially #166

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 26, 2024

Conversation

comps
Copy link
Contributor

@comps comps commented Apr 26, 2024

This is to make each /per-rule/N runner get a more diverse slice of all tests.

Fixes #163

This is to make each /per-rule/N runner get a more diverse
slice of all tests.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Jaburek <comps@nomail.dom>
@comps comps merged commit 828eedb into main Apr 26, 2024
3 checks passed
@comps comps deleted the non_sequential_per_rule branch April 26, 2024 17:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Randomize rules in /per-rule
1 participant