sys/bitfield: add bf_find_first_{set, unset}() #18833
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
github-actions
bot
added
Area: sys
benpicco
added
the
CI: ready for build
At functions to get the first (un)set bit in a bitfield.
benpicco
force-pushed
the
bitfield-ops
branch
from
3612a57
to
6185715
Compare
Murdock results✔️ PASSED 1737430 tests/unittests: add tests for bf_set_all()
ArtifactsThis only reflects a subset of all builds from https://ci-prod.riot-os.org. Please refer to https://ci.riot-os.org for a complete build for now. |
benpicco
force-pushed
the
bitfield-ops
branch
from
6a4e515
to
1737430
Compare
maribu
approved these changes
Nov 7, 2022
|
Given the low interconnection between the bitfield code and the remaining code, I think a 5 day old Murdock run is still good enough for this one. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Contribution description
I noticed that I needed these functions independent from #17045 and just as I was about to re-implement them, stale bot reminded me that I already did so a year ago.
So let's try to salvage them from that PR.
Testing procedure
Unittests are provided an can be build with
Issues/PRs references
split from #17045