-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
boards/esp32s3-wt32-sc01-plus: fix Kconfig #19953
boards/esp32s3-wt32-sc01-plus: fix Kconfig #19953
Conversation
The testing procedure fails with this PR:
I tried on commit 952bb26 |
What? 🤔 |
I can't reproduce it. The output for me is:
|
Ok, my bad: I don't have the esp32 toolchain on my system. After adding I'm trying again with |
So, I can't make it work using |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ACK
bors merge |
19946: posix_sockets.c: Fix 2 byte int compilation errors r=benpicco a=mrdeep1 19953: boards/esp32s3-wt32-sc01-plus: fix Kconfig r=aabadie a=gschorcht ### Contribution description This PR fixes a remaining Kconfig mismatch. It should fix the last compilation problem of the nightly. ### Testing procedure ``` python3 dist/tools/compile_test/compile_like_murdock.py -a tests/drivers/ili9341/ -b esp32s3-wt32-sc01-plus ``` should fail w/o this PR but should succeed with this PR. ### Issues/PRs references Co-authored-by: Jon Shallow <supjps-libcoap@jpshallow.com> Co-authored-by: Gunar Schorcht <gunar@schorcht.net>
Build failed (retrying...): |
Unrelated error. |
bors merge |
Already running a review |
Build succeeded! The publicly hosted instance of bors-ng is deprecated and will go away soon. If you want to self-host your own instance, instructions are here. If you want to switch to GitHub's built-in merge queue, visit their help page.
|
Contribution description
This PR fixes a remaining Kconfig mismatch. It should fix the last compilation problem of the nightly.
Testing procedure
should fail w/o this PR but should succeed with this PR.
Issues/PRs references