[flang][OpenMP] Handle usage of array elements in loop-control expressions #128
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ergawy
commented
Aug 1, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Dominik suggested to convert this to a smoke test instead. I will do that in a separate PR.
asitav
approved these changes
Aug 2, 2024
ergawy
force-pushed
the
handle_array_elems_in_loop_control
branch
from
9e00764 to
b50e1d1
Compare
…sions Extends the fix-up logic for `trip_count` calculation in `target` regions. Previously, if an array element was used to compute any of the loop bounds, the trip-count calculation ops would extract arra elements from the mapped declaration of the array inside the target region. This commit hanles that situation.
skatrak
approved these changes
Aug 7, 2024
ergawy
force-pushed
the
handle_array_elems_in_loop_control
branch
from
b50e1d1 to
ad1cf4c
Compare
searlmc1
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 14, 2024
This patch does 3 things:
1. Add support for optimizing the address mode of HVX load/store
instructions
2. Reduce the value of Add instruction immediates by replacing with the
difference from other Addi instructions that share common base:
For Example, If we have the below sequence of instructions: r1 =
add(r2,# 1024) ... r3 = add(r2,# 1152) ... r4 = add(r2,# 1280)
Where the register r2 has the same reaching definition, They get
modified to the below sequence:
r1 = add(r2,# 1024)
...
r3 = add(r1,# 128)
...
r4 = add(r1,# 256)
3. Fixes a bug pass where the addi instructions were modified based on a
predicated register definition, leading to incorrect output.
Eg:
INST-1: if (p0) r2 = add(r13,# 128)
INST-2: r1 = add(r2,# 1024)
INST-3: r3 = add(r2,# 1152)
INST-4: r5 = add(r2,# 1280)
In the above case, since r2's definition is predicated, we do not want
to modify the uses of r2 in INST-3/INST-4 with add(r1,#128/256)
4.Fixes a corner case
It looks like we never check whether the offset register is actually
live (not clobbered) at optimization site. Add the check whether it is
live at MBB entrance. The rest should have already been verified.
5. Fixes a bad codegen
For whatever reason we do transformation without checking if the value
in register actually reaches the user. This is second identical fix for
this pass.
Co-authored-by: Anirudh Sundar <quic_sanirudh@quicinc.com>
Co-authored-by: Sergei Larin <slarin@quicinc.com>
searlmc1
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 26, 2025
llvm#128662) …471)" Reland llvm#128471 The Passes library was not linked in earlier.
searlmc1
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 26, 2025
…PM (#128…" (llvm#128819) Reverts llvm#128662 Still a link error.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Extends the fix-up logic for
trip_countcalculation intargetregions. Previously, if an array element was used to compute any of the loop bounds, the trip-count calculation ops would extract arra elements from the mapped declaration of the array inside the target region. This commit hanles that situation.Hopefully, fixes https://ontrack-internal.amd.com/browse/SWDEV-476122