-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add recuperation of the current version from git if available. #731
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -143,6 +143,11 @@ section.footer:hover { | |
|
||
} | ||
|
||
section.footer .version { | ||
|
||
font-size: 80%; | ||
|
||
} | ||
|
||
section > h2 { | ||
|
||
|
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe include
$VERSION
as well?return Configuration::$VERSION . ' (' . trim(file_get_contents($revisionHashFile)) . ')';
=>
2018-06-10 (937ea492716b9251211a2a0f73f3afd1ac871505)
.git/refs/heads/master
always returns the latest commit inmaster
! It wouldn't show branches. Here is an alternative implementation for consideration:Notice: It uses
exec
to extract the latest commit hash in short form and reads the hash file only if that operation fails. This is purely cosmetic.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The reason I decided to read the
.git/refs/heads/master
is for simplicity: I know it only shows themaster
revision, but if we have a bug report, we only consider it for the version we maitain, that is master. Moreover, a lot of shared hosts do not allow exec, which is why I decided to go for simplicity.However I believe that we could include the branch name in the version string.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Including the branch name sounds like a much simpler alternative.
Using exec was just for cosmetic reasons (the full hash is quite long), as you can see it'll fall back to reading files if exec isn't working. But I'm not fixated on making this more complex than need be, so just leave it out 😄