feat(#153): Add support for rendering content in markdown format

[abhiabhi94]

resolves #153

[abhiabhi94]

The test failures from travis seem weird to me at the moment. 😞

tox passes locally for me. Seeing the logs, I think the tests are probably not being run on the latest version of this branch.

[abhiabhi94]

okay, got it, the test failures are from Django 2.1, didn't run tox locally on it.

So the failures on 2.1 is due to the bug. it has been fixed in django/django@e3d546a on 3.2. It was also back ported to 3.1 but not to 2.1 and 2.2.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #222 (f3a53b4) into develop (066c732) will decrease coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop     #222      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    99.89%   99.89%   -0.01%     
===========================================
  Files           55       55              
  Lines         1969     1936      -33     
  Branches       158      160       +2     
===========================================
- Hits          1967     1934      -33     
  Misses           1        1              
  Partials         1        1              

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
comment/context.py	100.00% <ø> (ø)
comment/conf/defaults.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
comment/templatetags/comment_tags.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
comment/mixins.py	100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
comment/validators.py	100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
comment/models/flags.py	100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
comment/views/comments.py	100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
comment/api/serializers.py	100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
comment/models/comments.py	100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
... and 4 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 066c732...f3a53b4. Read the comment docs.

[abhiabhi94]

Hey @Radi85, how are you?

This has been stagnant for a long time. I just updated this branch with the main branch. In case, you have some time, it would be great to have your review on this.

[abhiabhi94]

#234 fixes the failures occurring here.

[Radi85]

Hey @abhiabhi94, Thanks a lot for your good work!

[abhiabhi94]

Thanks @Radi85, for checking.