Remove g:raku_unicode_abbrevs feature #29
Closed
+2
−64
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
It's best to have the end user add these manually, rather than maintain them in the plugin. The documentation for them remains useful, I think. I've modified the documented definition for × and ÷ to require a trailing '+' character, which I believe should make them less obtrusive but still accessible. Of course, a user can use whatever they like if we are not defining them ourselves. Closes Raku#20
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
It's best to have the end user add these manually, rather than maintain
them in the plugin.
The documentation for them remains useful, I think.
I've modified the documented definition for × and ÷ to require a
trailing '+' character, which I believe should make them less obtrusive
but still accessible. Of course, a user can use whatever they like if we
are not defining them ourselves.
Closes #20