release: v10.1.3 #7431
Merged
release: v10.1.3 #7431
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rachel-fenichel
requested review from
maribethb
and removed request for
maribethb
BeksOmega
approved these changes
Aug 24, 2023
Contributor
BeksOmega
left a comment
BeksOmega
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Changed the target branch to master. LGTM!
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Proposed Changes
Revert "fix: insertion marker's next blocks become real block (fix: insertion marker's next blocks are real blocks #7384)"
Revert "feat: Insertion marker json deserialization 7316 ( feat: Insertion marker json deserialization 7316 #7364 )" "
Testing
Additional Information
See RaspberryPiFoundation/blockly-samples#1856 (comment) for context on why we are rolling back the change to make insertion markers use JSON serialization.
Full steps: