-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 991
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bug: .() mis-interpreted when being used as plotmath #1912
Comments
You can try |
that would make the plot expression much more verbose... the bquote part is if there's no fast way to to put a check on the dot replacement for its could add a replace_dot argument/option to be shut off in such rare cases? On Nov 13, 2016 8:33 AM, "Jan Gorecki" notifications@github.com wrote:
|
This should be a matter of changing |
Hmm, I tried other ways of getting around |
I second this since I occasionally plot in j and even have a package that does so. Just add a check for
Currently, I have to use
|
I just found out that sometimes
.()
is needed to create dynamically-labeled plots inbase
R:When used outside of
[.data.table
, the text is converted (as expected) to the evaluated value of the regression. But[.data.table
(I imagine) is detecting this as an alias forlist
and substituting, leading to the unexpected result on the left.Workaround for now is to use
with(DT, {...})
instead of calling[.data.table
but obviously this won't work in situations requiring other arguments of[.data.table
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: