Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add RunOnNotReady feature to cji #841

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 24, 2023
Merged

Conversation

gburges
Copy link
Contributor

@gburges gburges commented Jul 14, 2023

No description provided.

@gburges gburges changed the title add RunOnNotReady feature to cji [WIP]add RunOnNotReady feature to cji Jul 14, 2023
@gburges
Copy link
Contributor Author

gburges commented Jul 14, 2023

/retest

@gburges gburges force-pushed the runonempty branch 3 times, most recently from c369c87 to 2de3fca Compare July 14, 2023 18:40
@gburges gburges requested a review from psav July 20, 2023 11:55
@gburges gburges force-pushed the runonempty branch 2 times, most recently from dd3b599 to 744f450 Compare July 20, 2023 13:13
@gburges gburges force-pushed the runonempty branch 10 times, most recently from 4ecb52a to b6fd51d Compare July 26, 2023 14:54
@gburges gburges force-pushed the runonempty branch 3 times, most recently from 640c39f to 46adbe4 Compare July 27, 2023 16:12
@gburges gburges changed the title [WIP]add RunOnNotReady feature to cji add RunOnNotReady feature to cji Jul 28, 2023
@adamrdrew
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM!

@gburges gburges dismissed adamrdrew’s stale review July 28, 2023 14:14

implemented differently

@gburges gburges requested a review from adamrdrew July 28, 2023 14:15
@psav psav merged commit 16bd2bf into RedHatInsights:master Aug 24, 2023
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants