Jotai migration activeApp

[JetyAdam]

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHCLOUD-33325

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 85.29412% with 5 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 63.27%. Comparing base (d17fb3d) to head (e245e8e).

❗ Current head e245e8e differs from pull request most recent head c30af18

Please upload reports for the commit c30af18 to get more accurate results.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2866      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   63.09%   63.27%   +0.18%     
==========================================
  Files         210      211       +1     
  Lines        4644     4659      +15     
  Branches      914      857      -57     
==========================================
+ Hits         2930     2948      +18     
- Misses       1667     1700      +33     
+ Partials       47       11      -36     

Files	Coverage Δ
src/components/ChromeLink/ChromeLink.tsx	73.91% <100.00%> (ø)
src/components/RootApp/ScalprumRoot.tsx	76.25% <100.00%> (+0.60%)	⬆️
src/redux/action-types.ts	100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/redux/actions.ts	62.85% <ø> (-2.01%)	⬇️
src/redux/chromeReducers.ts	54.09% <ø> (+0.13%)	⬆️
src/redux/index.ts	100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/state/atoms/activeAppAtom.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/state/chromeStore.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/utils/consts.ts	85.29% <100.00%> (+12.79%)	⬆️
src/utils/useOuiaTags.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
... and 1 more

... and 18 files with indirect coverage changes

[Hyperkid123]

/retest

[Hyperkid123]

The code seems to be good. However, this has the potential to mess up. I'll do some extra local test runs with apps on router v5 to see if nothing broke.

Please don't merge this before that.

[Hyperkid123]

OK. I tried it with v5 apps locally. Its working well. @JetyAdam can you remove the old comments? This can be merged after that.