feat: refactor lit protocol provider #1512
Conversation
…updates - Updated package.json to include new Lit Protocol dependencies and modified start command for request-node. - Added integration tests for Lit Protocol in the integration-test package, covering encryption and decryption functionalities. - Refactored LitProvider to streamline client initialization and improve error handling. - Updated CircleCI configuration to utilize the new start command. - Adjusted request-node configuration for Lit Protocol network settings. - Enhanced yarn.lock with new dependencies and versions for Lit Protocol packages.
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several modifications across multiple packages, primarily focusing on updates to the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
packages/integration-test/test/lit-protocol.test.ts (2)
221-236: Specify expected error in decryption testIn the test
'should handle decryption errors gracefully', the assertion usesrejects.toThrow()without specifying the expected error message or type. Providing a specific error message improves test reliability and clarity.Apply this diff to specify the expected error:
await expect( litProvider.decrypt(invalidEncryptedData, { encryptionParams: [ { key: userWallet.address, method: Types.Encryption.METHOD.KMS, }, ], }), - ).rejects.toThrow(); + ).rejects.toThrow('Decryption failed: Invalid encrypted data');
80-97: Handle errors explicitly inafterAllcleanupIn the
afterAllhook, errors caught during cleanup are logged but not handled. If these errors can affect subsequent tests or leave resources hanging, consider handling them appropriately or re-throwing after logging.package.json (1)
30-30: Ensure environment variable is managed appropriatelyThe
start:request-nodescript now includes the environment variableLIT_PROTOCOL_NETWORK=datil-dev. Verify that this variable is necessary for all environments. If it's specific to certain environments (e.g., development or testing), consider using environment configuration files or scripts to manage it, to prevent unintended behavior in production.packages/request-node/src/request/getLitCapacityDelegationAuthSig.ts (1)
33-52: Consider adding error handling for token retrieval.The token retrieval logic could benefit from more robust error handling. Currently, if
litContractClient.connect()fails, the error will propagate without specific handling.Consider wrapping the token retrieval in a try-catch block:
} else { const litContractClient = new LitContracts({ signer: ethersSigner, network: config.getLitProtocolNetwork() as LIT_NETWORKS_KEYS, }); - await litContractClient.connect(); + try { + await litContractClient.connect(); + const existingTokens: { tokenId: string }[] = + await litContractClient.rateLimitNftContractUtils.read.getTokensByOwnerAddress( + await ethersSigner.getAddress(), + ); - const existingTokens: { tokenId: string }[] = - await litContractClient.rateLimitNftContractUtils.read.getTokensByOwnerAddress( - await ethersSigner.getAddress(), - ); - - if (existingTokens.length === 0) { - serverResponse.status(StatusCodes.UNPROCESSABLE_ENTITY).send('No existing tokens'); - return; - } - tokenId = `${existingTokens[existingTokens.length - 1].tokenId}`; + if (existingTokens.length === 0) { + serverResponse.status(StatusCodes.UNPROCESSABLE_ENTITY).send('No existing tokens'); + return; + } + tokenId = `${existingTokens[existingTokens.length - 1].tokenId}`; + } catch (error) { + this.logger.error(`Failed to retrieve tokens: ${error}`); + serverResponse.status(StatusCodes.INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR).send('Failed to retrieve tokens'); + return; + } }packages/lit-protocol-cipher/test/index.test.ts (1)
206-226: Good coverage of object data encryption and error handling.The tests properly verify both object data encryption and client initialization errors. Consider adding a test case for very large objects to verify performance and memory handling.
Add a test case for large objects:
it('should handle large object data', async () => { const largeObject = { data: Array(1000).fill('test-data'), metadata: Array(100).fill({ key: 'value' }) }; const result = await litProvider.encrypt(largeObject, { encryptionParams: mockEncryptionParams, }); expect(result).toEqual(mockEncryptResponse); });packages/request-node/src/config.ts (1)
49-49: Consider using an enum or constant for network values.Using string literals for network values could lead to typos and maintenance issues. Consider defining an enum or importing network constants from the Lit Protocol package.
+import { LIT_NETWORKS_KEYS } from '@lit-protocol/types'; + const defaultValues = { - litProtocolNetwork: 'datil', + litProtocolNetwork: LIT_NETWORKS_KEYS.Datil,
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
yarn.lockis excluded by!**/yarn.lock,!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
.circleci/config.yml(2 hunks)package.json(1 hunks)packages/integration-test/package.json(1 hunks)packages/integration-test/test/lit-protocol.test.ts(1 hunks)packages/lit-protocol-cipher/src/lit-protocol-cipher-provider.ts(16 hunks)packages/lit-protocol-cipher/test/index.test.ts(6 hunks)packages/request-node/package.json(1 hunks)packages/request-node/src/config.ts(1 hunks)packages/request-node/src/request/getLitCapacityDelegationAuthSig.ts(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (2)
packages/lit-protocol-cipher/test/index.test.ts (1)
Learnt from: rodrigopavezi
PR: RequestNetwork/requestNetwork#1475
File: packages/lit-protocol-cipher/src/lit-protocol-cipher-provider.ts:124-153
Timestamp: 2024-11-21T08:59:19.774Z
Learning: The code in `packages/lit-protocol-cipher/src/lit-protocol-cipher-provider.ts` that follows the Lit Protocol Documentation should not be modified.
packages/lit-protocol-cipher/src/lit-protocol-cipher-provider.ts (1)
Learnt from: rodrigopavezi
PR: RequestNetwork/requestNetwork#1475
File: packages/lit-protocol-cipher/src/lit-protocol-cipher-provider.ts:124-153
Timestamp: 2024-11-21T08:59:19.774Z
Learning: The code in `packages/lit-protocol-cipher/src/lit-protocol-cipher-provider.ts` that follows the Lit Protocol Documentation should not be modified.
🔇 Additional comments (8)
packages/lit-protocol-cipher/src/lit-protocol-cipher-provider.ts (2)
Line range hint 59-71: Constructor simplification aligns with Lit Protocol updates
The refactoring of the constructor to accept litClient directly simplifies initialization and aligns with the latest Lit Protocol practices.
194-200: Validation added for encryption parameters
The additional validation in getLitAccessControlConditions ensures that each encryption parameter includes the required key field, enhancing error handling and preventing potential runtime issues.
packages/integration-test/package.json (1)
32-41: Inclusion of Lit Protocol tests in the test suite
The addition of the test:lit script and updating the main test script to include it enhances test coverage for the Lit Protocol integration. This ensures that the new tests are run consistently with other integration tests.
packages/request-node/package.json (1)
49-49: Verify the new dependency @lit-protocol/types
The addition of @lit-protocol/types version 7.0.1 introduces new types for the Lit Protocol. Ensure compatibility with existing code and verify that there are no known security vulnerabilities associated with this package.
Run the following script to check for security advisories:
✅ Verification successful
Let me verify the usage and compatibility of this package in the codebase.
Package upgrade appears safe and compatible
The verification shows that:
- No security vulnerabilities were found for
@lit-protocol/typesin the GitHub Advisory Database - The upgrade is a minor version bump from 7.0.0 to 7.0.1
- The package is already used across multiple packages in the codebase (
request-node,types,lit-protocol-cipher) - The imports are type-only imports (AuthSig, LIT_NETWORKS_KEYS), which reduces the risk of runtime issues
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for security advisories for the `@lit-protocol/types` package.
# Fetch security advisories from the GitHub Advisory Database
gh api graphql -f query='
{
securityVulnerabilities(ecosystem: NPM, package: "@lit-protocol/types", first: 5) {
nodes {
advisory {
summary
severity
permalink
}
vulnerableVersionRange
}
}
}'
Length of output: 295
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check where and how @lit-protocol/types is being used
rg "@lit-protocol/types" -A 3
# Check package.json files for other @lit-protocol dependencies
fd package.json --exec grep -l "@lit-protocol"
# Look for type imports from @lit-protocol/types
ast-grep --pattern 'import { $_ } from "@lit-protocol/types"'
Length of output: 5558
packages/request-node/src/request/getLitCapacityDelegationAuthSig.ts (1)
56-56: Verify network type safety.
The code casts the network type to LIT_NETWORKS_KEYS without validation. This could lead to runtime errors if the configured network is not a valid Lit Protocol network.
Let's verify the network configuration:
Also applies to: 62-62
✅ Verification successful
Let me check the implementation details of these files to verify the network type safety.
Let me check the type definition and validation for LIT_NETWORKS_KEYS.
Let me check the package-specific dependencies and the network configuration validation.
Let me check the network validation in the Lit Protocol dependencies.
Based on the gathered information, I can now provide the final response:
Type casting is safe due to dependency validation
The type casting to LIT_NETWORKS_KEYS is safe because:
- The project uses
@lit-protocol/types@7.0.1which provides the network type definitions - The default network value is set to 'datil' in the configuration
- The
LitNodeClientandLitContractsconstructors from the Lit Protocol libraries validate the network value at runtime - The network value can be configured via environment variable 'LIT_PROTOCOL_NETWORK' with a safe default
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the configured network is a valid Lit Protocol network
# Expected: The configured network should be one of the valid Lit Protocol networks
# Search for network configuration
echo "Searching for network configuration..."
rg -l "getLitProtocolNetwork|litProtocolNetwork"
# Search for network type definitions
echo "Searching for network type definitions..."
rg -l "LIT_NETWORKS_KEYS"
Length of output: 430
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation of getLitProtocolNetwork and network type definitions
echo "Checking config.ts implementation:"
cat packages/request-node/src/config.ts
echo -e "\nChecking network type definitions and usage:"
rg -A 5 "LIT_NETWORKS_KEYS"
Length of output: 12831
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the imported type definition
echo "Checking package.json for @lit-protocol/types version:"
cat package.json
echo -e "\nSearching for network validation:"
rg -B 3 -A 3 "getLitProtocolNetwork.*as LIT_NETWORKS_KEYS" --type ts
Length of output: 4427
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check package-specific dependencies and network configuration
echo "Checking request-node package.json:"
cat packages/request-node/package.json
echo -e "\nChecking for network validation in config initialization:"
rg -B 2 -A 2 "litProtocolNetwork.*=.*" --type ts
Length of output: 2919
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for network validation in Lit Protocol dependencies
echo "Checking for network constants and validation:"
rg -B 2 -A 2 "LIT_NETWORKS_KEYS|litNetwork" --type ts
echo -e "\nChecking for network initialization and validation:"
ast-grep --pattern 'litNetwork: $_ as LIT_NETWORKS_KEYS'
Length of output: 2377
packages/lit-protocol-cipher/test/index.test.ts (2)
43-53: LGTM! Mock implementations correctly reflect the Lit Protocol's response structure.
The mock implementations for encrypt and decrypt now properly return objects that match the Lit Protocol's API structure, improving test reliability.
102-143: Well-structured test cases for encryption and decryption state management.
The test cases thoroughly cover the state management functionality, including edge cases and state transitions.
.circleci/config.yml (1)
394-394: LGTM! Command simplified using workspace script.
The command has been correctly simplified to use the root workspace script, which aligns with the PR objectives.
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
github-actions
bot
requested review from
alexandre-abrioux,
kevindavee,
sstefdev and
yomarion
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.circleci/config.yml (1)
9-10: Document the reason for increasing Node.js memory limit.The Node.js heap memory limit has been increased to 8GB. While this might be necessary for the Lit Protocol integration, please document the reason for this significant increase to help future maintainers understand the memory requirements.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
.circleci/config.yml(5 hunks)packages/lit-protocol-cipher/README.md(3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
packages/lit-protocol-cipher/README.md (1)
Learnt from: rodrigopavezi
PR: RequestNetwork/requestNetwork#1475
File: packages/lit-protocol-cipher/src/lit-protocol-cipher-provider.ts:124-153
Timestamp: 2024-11-21T08:59:19.774Z
Learning: The code in `packages/lit-protocol-cipher/src/lit-protocol-cipher-provider.ts` that follows the Lit Protocol Documentation should not be modified.
🔇 Additional comments (5)
packages/lit-protocol-cipher/README.md (3)
3-5: LGTM! Clear and concise package description.
The description effectively communicates the package's purpose and its relationship with the Request Network protocol.
86-89: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Remove redundant wallet disconnection.
The wallet disconnection is currently called twice - once in the try block and again in the finally block. This is redundant and could potentially cause issues.
Suggest removing the disconnection from the try block and keeping it only in the finally block:
// Disconnect wallet when done
- await litProvider.disconnectWallet();
} catch (error) {
console.error('Error:', error);
} finally {
// Disconnect wallet when done
await litProvider.disconnectWallet();
}Likely invalid or redundant comment.
15-15: Verify alignment with Lit Protocol documentation.
The initialization example looks good, but let's ensure it follows the official Lit Protocol documentation.
Let's verify the implementation against the official documentation:
Also applies to: 19-19, 24-32, 36-38
✅ Verification successful
Documentation matches Lit Protocol implementation standards
The example in the README.md correctly demonstrates the Lit Protocol integration:
- Uses the official
LitNodeClientfrom@lit-protocol/lit-node-client - Shows proper initialization with network configuration
- Includes required client initialization step
- Demonstrates correct session signature handling
- Provides comprehensive error handling guidance
- Shows proper wallet connection and disconnection flow
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for any Lit Protocol documentation files or examples in the codebase
# that might indicate alignment with official documentation
# Look for Lit Protocol related documentation
rg -g '!node_modules' -g '!dist' -l 'lit.*protocol' --type md
# Look for any example implementations
rg -g '!node_modules' -g '!dist' 'LitNodeClient.*initialization' --type ts
Length of output: 189
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the actual implementation and documentation more thoroughly
# Check the content of both README files
echo "=== Main README.md ==="
cat README.md
echo -e "\n=== Lit Protocol Cipher README.md ==="
cat packages/lit-protocol-cipher/README.md
# Look for actual implementation details
echo -e "\n=== Implementation Details ==="
rg -g '!node_modules' -g '!dist' "class LitProtocolProvider" -A 10
# Search for initialization patterns
echo -e "\n=== Initialization Patterns ==="
rg -g '!node_modules' -g '!dist' "new LitNodeClient|connect\(\)" -A 5
Length of output: 18736
.circleci/config.yml (2)
65-65: LGTM! Resource class update aligns with memory requirements.
Setting resource_class to 'large' is appropriate given the increased memory allocation in NODE_OPTIONS.
382-382: Verify the existence of the start:request-node script.
The command has been simplified to use yarn start:request-node. Please ensure this script is properly defined in the root package.json or the request-node package.json.
Run this script to verify the command:
Also applies to: 487-487
✅ Verification successful
Command verification successful
The yarn start:request-node command is properly configured:
- Root package.json has the script
start:request-nodedefined as"LIT_PROTOCOL_NETWORK=datil-dev yarn workspace @requestnetwork/request-node start" - The request-node package (in packages/request-node) has the
startscript defined as"ts-node src/bin.ts"
This forms a valid command chain where the root script sets the environment and calls the workspace package's start script.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if start:request-node script exists in package.json files
# Check root package.json
echo "Checking root package.json:"
jq '.scripts["start:request-node"]' package.json
# Check request-node package.json
echo "Checking request-node package.json:"
fd -g "package.json" -p "request-node" -x jq '.scripts["start"]' {}
Length of output: 447
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try to find the request-node package location first
fd -t d "request-node$"
# Then check its package.json if found
fd -t f "package.json" -x sh -c 'echo "=== {} ==="; cat {} | jq ".scripts.start"'
Length of output: 1654
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
package.json (1)
30-30: Consider making the Lit Protocol network configurableInstead of hardcoding the network value, consider making it configurable through environment variables or configuration files. This would provide more flexibility across different environments.
- "start:request-node": "LIT_PROTOCOL_NETWORK=datil-dev yarn workspace @requestnetwork/request-node start", + "start:request-node": "yarn workspace @requestnetwork/request-node start"Then, handle the environment variable in one of these ways:
- Through a
.envfile- Through configuration files per environment
- Through command-line arguments when running the script
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
yarn.lockis excluded by!**/yarn.lock,!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
package.json(1 hunks)packages/lit-protocol-cipher/package.json(1 hunks)packages/request-node/package.json(1 hunks)packages/types/package.json(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- packages/request-node/package.json
🔇 Additional comments (2)
packages/types/package.json (1)
41-41: Verify version consistency across packages
The update to @lit-protocol/types@7.0.1 appears to be part of a coordinated update across packages. Let's verify the consistency and check for any known issues.
✅ Verification successful
Version consistency verified across packages
All packages using @lit-protocol/types are consistently using version 7.0.1:
@requestnetwork/lit-protocol-cipher: 7.0.1@requestnetwork/request-node: 7.0.1@requestnetwork/types: 7.0.1
No open issues were found for version 7.0.1 in the LIT Protocol repository.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check version consistency of @lit-protocol/types across all package.json files
# and look for any reported issues with version 7.0.1
# Check version consistency
echo "Checking @lit-protocol/types version across packages..."
fd package.json | xargs grep -l "@lit-protocol/types" | xargs cat | jq -r 'select(.dependencies."@lit-protocol/types") | "\(.name): \(.dependencies."@lit-protocol/types")"'
# Check for any issues in the GitHub repository
gh api graphql -f query='
{
repository(owner: "LIT-Protocol", name: "js-sdk") {
issues(first: 5, states: OPEN, filterBy: {labels: ["bug"], milestone: "7.0.1"}) {
nodes {
title
url
labels(first: 5) {
nodes {
name
}
}
}
}
}
}'
Length of output: 764
packages/lit-protocol-cipher/package.json (1)
43-49: Verify compatibility between different Lit Protocol package versions
While most Lit Protocol packages have been updated to 7.0.1, @lit-protocol/contracts remains at 0.0.74. Let's verify the compatibility between these versions.
✅ Verification successful
Different package versions appear to be compatible
The version difference between @lit-protocol/contracts (0.0.74) and other Lit Protocol packages (7.0.1) appears to be intentional and compatible:
- None of the 7.0.1 packages have peer dependencies on each other
- The contracts package (0.0.74) only has a peer dependency on TypeScript
- The contracts package has no direct dependencies on other Lit Protocol packages
- Only two packages in the monorepo use the contracts package, suggesting limited coupling
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check compatibility between Lit Protocol package versions
# Check if there are any peer dependency requirements
echo "Checking peer dependencies..."
for pkg in auth-helpers constants encryption lit-node-client lit-node-client-nodejs types; do
echo "Checking @lit-protocol/$pkg@7.0.1..."
curl -s "https://registry.npmjs.org/@lit-protocol/$pkg/7.0.1" | jq '.peerDependencies'
done
# Check if contracts package specifies compatible versions
echo "Checking @lit-protocol/contracts@0.0.74..."
curl -s "https://registry.npmjs.org/@lit-protocol/contracts/0.0.74" | jq '.peerDependencies'
Length of output: 2020
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the dependencies of contracts package to see if it has any dependencies on other lit-protocol packages
echo "Checking dependencies of @lit-protocol/contracts@0.0.74..."
curl -s "https://registry.npmjs.org/@lit-protocol/contracts/0.0.74" | jq '.dependencies'
# Also check if there are any other packages in the monorepo using contracts package
echo -e "\nChecking usage of contracts package in the monorepo..."
fd package.json --exec grep -l "@lit-protocol/contracts"
Length of output: 481
packages/request-node/src/request/getLitCapacityDelegationAuthSig.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
packages/request-node/src/request/getLitCapacityDelegationAuthSig.ts (2)
34-37: Add documentation for DatilDev special caseThe logic for handling the DatilDev network differently is correct, but it would benefit from a comment explaining why tokenId is set to '0' for this specific network.
let tokenId = '0'; +// DatilDev network uses a fixed tokenId of '0' for testing purposes if ((config.getLitProtocolNetwork() as LIT_NETWORKS_KEYS) === LIT_NETWORK.DatilDev) { tokenId = '0'; } else {
38-53: Consider enhancing error handling for contract connectionThe contract initialization and token retrieval logic is correct, but consider adding specific error handling for contract connection failures.
const litContractClient = new LitContracts({ signer: ethersSigner, network: config.getLitProtocolNetwork() as LIT_NETWORKS_KEYS, }); -await litContractClient.connect(); +try { + await litContractClient.connect(); +} catch (error) { + this.logger.error(`Failed to connect to Lit Contracts: ${error}`); + throw error; +}packages/integration-test/test/lit-protocol.test.ts (5)
7-31: LGTM! Robust implementation with proper retry logicThe implementation includes proper error handling and retry logic. The state check for
CREATEDorPENDINGis correct as per design.Consider adding JSDoc comments for better documentation:
+/** + * Utility function to pause execution for a specified duration + * @param ms Duration in milliseconds + */ const sleep = (ms: number) => new Promise((resolve) => setTimeout(resolve, ms)); +/** + * Waits for a request to be confirmed by checking its state + * @param request Request object to check + * @param maxAttempts Maximum number of retry attempts + * @param delayMs Delay between attempts in milliseconds + * @throws Error if request is not confirmed after max attempts + */ async function waitForConfirmation(request: any, maxAttempts = 10, delayMs = 1000): Promise<void> {
47-76: Consider increasing timeout and improving cleanupThe test setup is comprehensive, but consider the following improvements:
- The 30-second timeout might not be sufficient in CI environments
- Resources should be released even if initialization fails
-}, 30000); +}, 60000); // Increase timeout for CI environments +let initialized = false; beforeAll(async () => { try { // ... existing setup code ... + initialized = true; + } catch (error) { + console.error('Setup failed:', error); + throw error; } });
97-113: Add edge cases to encryption testThe basic encryption/decryption test is good, but consider adding tests for:
- Empty string encryption
- Large data encryption
- Special characters in the data
it('should encrypt and decrypt data directly', async () => { + const testCases = [ + 'test encryption', + '', // Empty string + 'a'.repeat(1000), // Large data + '!@#$%^&*()', // Special characters + ]; + + for (const testData of testCases) { const encryptionParams = [ { key: userWallet.address, method: Types.Encryption.METHOD.KMS, }, ]; - const testData = 'test encryption'; // ... rest of the test ... + } });
115-193: Use dynamic test data instead of hardcoded valuesThe test is comprehensive, but consider making it more maintainable by:
- Moving hardcoded addresses to constants
- Using dynamic timestamps instead of hardcoded values
+const TEST_ADDRESSES = { + ZERO_ADDRESS: '0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000', + TEST_PAYER: '0xb07D2398d2004378cad234DA0EF14f1c94A530e4', +}; it('should create and encrypt a request', async () => { const requestParams = { requestInfo: { currency: { type: Types.RequestLogic.CURRENCY.ETH, - value: '0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000', + value: TEST_ADDRESSES.ZERO_ADDRESS, network: 'sepolia', }, // ... rest of the test ... }, };
195-238: Enhance error assertionsThe error handling tests are good, but consider making the error assertions more specific to catch unexpected error types.
await expect(async () => { await litProvider.encrypt('test data', { encryptionParams: invalidEncryptionParams }); -}).rejects.toThrow('Invalid encryption parameter at index 0: missing key'); +}).rejects.toThrow(expect.objectContaining({ + message: expect.stringContaining('Invalid encryption parameter'), + name: 'Error' // Or a more specific error type if available +}));
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
packages/integration-test/test/lit-protocol.test.ts(1 hunks)packages/lit-protocol-cipher/README.md(3 hunks)packages/request-node/src/request/getLitCapacityDelegationAuthSig.ts(2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- packages/lit-protocol-cipher/README.md
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
packages/integration-test/test/lit-protocol.test.ts (2)
Learnt from: rodrigopavezi
PR: RequestNetwork/requestNetwork#1512
File: packages/integration-test/test/lit-protocol.test.ts:9-31
Timestamp: 2024-12-06T11:27:46.988Z
Learning: In the `waitForConfirmation` function within `packages/integration-test/test/lit-protocol.test.ts`, checking for the request state being `CREATED` or `PENDING` is correct as per design.
Learnt from: rodrigopavezi
PR: RequestNetwork/requestNetwork#1512
File: packages/integration-test/test/lit-protocol.test.ts:208-210
Timestamp: 2024-12-05T23:29:55.043Z
Learning: In integration tests, it's acceptable to mock private methods such as `getLitAccessControlConditions`.
🔇 Additional comments (2)
packages/request-node/src/request/getLitCapacityDelegationAuthSig.ts (2)
9-10: LGTM! Type-safe imports added
The addition of these type imports enhances type safety when handling network configurations.
57-57: Verify network configuration across environments
The type-safe network configuration is good, but ensure it works correctly across all deployment environments.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the network configuration types and usage.
Let me check the actual implementation of these network-related types and constants from the imported packages.
Based on the analysis of the code and types, I can now generate the final response:
Network configuration type casting is safe and consistent
The type casting of getLitProtocolNetwork() to LIT_NETWORKS_KEYS is safe and correctly implemented. The code shows:
- Consistent usage across the codebase
- Type imports from
@lit-protocol/typesand@lit-protocol/constants - Used in conjunction with
LIT_NETWORKenum for network validation - Applied in both network configuration and client initialization contexts
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for network configuration usage across the codebase
rg -A 2 "litNetwork:|getLitProtocolNetwork"
Length of output: 1939
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for network type definitions and their usage
ast-grep --pattern 'type LIT_NETWORKS_KEYS = $$$'
# Check for LIT_NETWORK enum or constant definitions
rg -A 5 "export (type|enum|const) LIT_NETWORK"
# Check for network-related imports
rg "import.*LIT_NETWORK"
Length of output: 559
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find files that might contain the network type definitions
fd -e ts -e js "constants|types" --exec grep -l "LIT_NETWORK"
# Check the content of any found files
fd -e ts -e js "constants|types" --exec sh -c 'echo "=== $1 ==="; cat "$1"' sh {} \;
Length of output: 67532
packages/lit-protocol-cipher/src/lit-protocol-cipher-provider.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: MantisClone <david.huntmateo@request.network>
…equestNetwork/requestNetwork into refactor/lit-protocol-provider
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
packages/lit-protocol-cipher/test/index.test.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-275: Consider adding tests for concurrent operationsWhile the current test coverage is good, consider adding tests for:
- Multiple concurrent encryption operations
- Multiple concurrent decryption operations
- Race conditions in state management
This would help ensure thread-safety and proper handling of concurrent requests.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
packages/lit-protocol-cipher/test/index.test.ts(6 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
packages/lit-protocol-cipher/test/index.test.ts (1)
Learnt from: rodrigopavezi
PR: RequestNetwork/requestNetwork#1475
File: packages/lit-protocol-cipher/src/lit-protocol-cipher-provider.ts:124-153
Timestamp: 2024-11-21T08:59:19.774Z
Learning: The code in `packages/lit-protocol-cipher/src/lit-protocol-cipher-provider.ts` that follows the Lit Protocol Documentation should not be modified.
🔇 Additional comments (5)
packages/lit-protocol-cipher/test/index.test.ts (5)
18-18: LGTM: Mock setup properly reflects Lit Protocol's response format
The mock implementation correctly structures the responses for encrypt/decrypt operations according to Lit Protocol's specifications, and the constructor changes align with the refactoring objectives.
Also applies to: 26-26, 31-31, 43-53, 63-63
74-78: LGTM: Good test coverage for constructor defaults
The test properly verifies the default chain parameter, ensuring backward compatibility.
102-149: LGTM: Comprehensive state management test coverage
The test suite thoroughly covers:
- Basic state transitions
- Encryption availability checks
- Decryption availability with session signatures
- Edge cases and error conditions
212-225: LGTM: Proper object serialization test
The test correctly verifies that object data is properly serialized using JSON.stringify before encryption.
227-232: LGTM: Good error handling test coverage
The test properly verifies that appropriate errors are thrown when attempting to use an uninitialized client.
- Added a new tsconfig reference for the lit-protocol-cipher package in the integration test configuration. - Renamed the class from `LitProvider` to `LitProtocolCipherProvider` for better clarity and consistency in naming.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
packages/lit-protocol-cipher/src/lit-protocol-cipher-provider.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-340: Consider adding JSDoc examplesWhile the JSDoc comments are comprehensive, adding usage examples would improve developer experience.
Example addition for the constructor:
/** * @example * const litClient = new LitNodeClient(); * const provider = new LitProtocolCipherProvider( * litClient, * { nodeConnectionConfig }, * 'ethereum' * ); */
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
packages/integration-test/tsconfig.build.json(1 hunks)packages/lit-protocol-cipher/src/lit-protocol-cipher-provider.ts(16 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
packages/lit-protocol-cipher/src/lit-protocol-cipher-provider.ts (1)
Learnt from: rodrigopavezi
PR: RequestNetwork/requestNetwork#1475
File: packages/lit-protocol-cipher/src/lit-protocol-cipher-provider.ts:124-153
Timestamp: 2024-11-21T08:59:19.774Z
Learning: The code in `packages/lit-protocol-cipher/src/lit-protocol-cipher-provider.ts` that follows the Lit Protocol Documentation should not be modified.
🔇 Additional comments (5)
packages/integration-test/tsconfig.build.json (1)
15-15: LGTM: Reference addition is correct
The addition of the lit-protocol-cipher reference is properly structured and aligns with the PR's objective of supporting integration tests for the Lit Protocol functionality.
packages/lit-protocol-cipher/src/lit-protocol-cipher-provider.ts (4)
18-19: LGTM: Import and class renaming changes
The addition of disconnectWeb3 import and the class renaming to LitProtocolCipherProvider improve clarity and better reflect the component's purpose.
Also applies to: 22-27
194-200: LGTM: Enhanced parameter validation
The added validation for encryption parameters improves error handling and provides clearer error messages.
46-46: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Remove nullable type from litClient property
Since litClient is required in the constructor and never null, the property type should not be nullable.
- private litClient: LitNodeClient | LitNodeClientNodeJs;
+ private readonly litClient: LitNodeClient | LitNodeClientNodeJs;Also applies to: 59-64
76-79: Verify litClient usage across methods
The refactoring consistently uses the injected litClient across all methods. However, we should verify that all error messages align with the Lit Protocol's documentation.
Consider creating a dedicated error types/constants file for consistent error messages across the codebase.
Also applies to: 101-103, 115-117, 127-127, 149-149, 166-176, 277-279, 287-291, 299-299, 319-321, 331-339
✅ Verification successful
Error handling is consistent across the codebase
The error messages in the lit-protocol-cipher-provider are consistent and well-defined:
- 'Failed to initialize Lit client: ${error.message}' for connection failures
- 'Lit client not initialized' for uninitialized client checks
- 'Session signatures are required to decrypt data' for missing session signatures
These error messages are also consistently used in tests and properly validated. No alignment issues were found.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for error messages in Lit Protocol's documentation
rg -l "Failed to initialize Lit client|Lit client not initialized|Session signatures are required" \
--type md \
--glob "!node_modules"
Length of output: 133
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for error messages in the codebase to check consistency
rg "Failed to initialize|not initialized|Session signatures" \
--type ts \
--glob "!node_modules" \
-A 1 -B 1
# Search for error handling patterns in the lit-protocol-cipher-provider
rg "throw new Error|catch \(error\)" packages/lit-protocol-cipher/src/lit-protocol-cipher-provider.ts \
-A 1 -B 1
Length of output: 3714
- Improved validation for encryption parameters by ensuring keys are present. - Added sorting of encryption parameters by key to meet protocol requirements. - Simplified the creation of access control conditions using a helper function and reduced the complexity of the conditions array generation.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
packages/lit-protocol-cipher/src/lit-protocol-cipher-provider.ts (5)
75-77: Remove unnecessary null check in disconnectClient.Since
litClientis now non-nullable, the null check indisconnectClientis redundant.public async disconnectClient(): Promise<void> { - if (this.litClient) { - await this.litClient.disconnect(); - } + await this.litClient.disconnect(); }Also applies to: 100-104
115-117: Remove unnecessary litClient null check.Since
litClientis now non-nullable, this check is redundant.- if (!this.litClient) { - throw new Error('Lit client not initialized'); - }
266-268: Remove unnecessary litClient null check in encrypt method.Since
litClientis now non-nullable, this check is redundant.- if (!this.litClient) { - throw new Error('Lit client not initialized'); - }
308-310: Remove unnecessary litClient null check in decrypt method.Since
litClientis now non-nullable, this check is redundant.- if (!this.litClient) { - throw new Error('Lit client not initialized'); - }
Line range hint
1-329: Consider enhancing error handling with custom error types.The error handling could be improved by introducing custom error types for different failure scenarios (initialization, encryption, decryption, etc.). This would make it easier for consumers to handle specific error cases.
Example implementation:
class LitProtocolError extends Error { constructor(message: string, public readonly code: string) { super(message); this.name = 'LitProtocolError'; } } // Usage throw new LitProtocolError('Session signatures are required to decrypt data', 'ERR_NO_SESSION_SIGS');
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
packages/lit-protocol-cipher/src/lit-protocol-cipher-provider.ts(16 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
packages/lit-protocol-cipher/src/lit-protocol-cipher-provider.ts (1)
Learnt from: rodrigopavezi
PR: RequestNetwork/requestNetwork#1475
File: packages/lit-protocol-cipher/src/lit-protocol-cipher-provider.ts:124-153
Timestamp: 2024-11-21T08:59:19.774Z
Learning: The code in `packages/lit-protocol-cipher/src/lit-protocol-cipher-provider.ts` that follows the Lit Protocol Documentation should not be modified.
🔇 Additional comments (2)
packages/lit-protocol-cipher/src/lit-protocol-cipher-provider.ts (2)
18-27: LGTM! Clean import addition and class renaming.
The new import and class renaming improve clarity and better reflect the provider's purpose.
194-221: LGTM! Robust parameter validation and consistent sorting.
The added validation and sorting logic ensures reliable encryption/decryption operations:
- Validates required parameters
- Ensures consistent key ordering
- Clean implementation of condition creation
- Upgraded multiple @LIT-Protocol packages to version 7.0.2 in yarn.lock and package.json files across various packages. - Updated the default chain parameter in LitProtocolCipherProvider constructor to 'ethereum'. - Ensured consistency in dependency versions across integration-test, lit-protocol-cipher, request-node, and types packages.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
packages/lit-protocol-cipher/src/lit-protocol-cipher-provider.ts (2)
Line range hint
75-103: Enhance error handling in initializeClient.While the implementation is correct, consider providing more specific error information by including the error type:
public async initializeClient(): Promise<void> { try { await this.litClient?.connect(); } catch (error) { - throw new Error(`Failed to initialize Lit client: ${error.message}`); + throw new Error(`Failed to initialize Lit client: ${error.name}: ${error.message}`); } }
Line range hint
265-328: Add input validation for encryption/decryption data.Consider adding validation for the input data:
public async encrypt( data: string | { [key: string]: any }, options: { encryptionParams: EncryptionTypes.IEncryptionParameters[]; }, ): Promise<EncryptResponse | null> { if (!this.litClient) { throw new Error('Lit client not initialized'); } + if (!data) { + throw new Error('Data to encrypt cannot be null or undefined'); + } const stringifiedData = typeof data === 'string' ? data : JSON.stringify(data);Similar validation should be added to the decrypt method:
public async decrypt( encryptedData: EncryptResponse, options: { encryptionParams: EncryptionTypes.IEncryptionParameters[]; }, ): Promise<string | null> { if (!this.litClient) { throw new Error('Lit client not initialized'); } + if (!encryptedData?.ciphertext || !encryptedData?.dataToEncryptHash) { + throw new Error('Invalid encrypted data format'); + }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
yarn.lockis excluded by!**/yarn.lock,!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
packages/integration-test/package.json(1 hunks)packages/lit-protocol-cipher/package.json(1 hunks)packages/lit-protocol-cipher/src/lit-protocol-cipher-provider.ts(16 hunks)packages/request-node/package.json(1 hunks)packages/types/package.json(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
- packages/types/package.json
- packages/request-node/package.json
- packages/integration-test/package.json
- packages/lit-protocol-cipher/package.json
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
packages/lit-protocol-cipher/src/lit-protocol-cipher-provider.ts (1)
Learnt from: rodrigopavezi
PR: RequestNetwork/requestNetwork#1475
File: packages/lit-protocol-cipher/src/lit-protocol-cipher-provider.ts:124-153
Timestamp: 2024-11-21T08:59:19.774Z
Learning: The code in `packages/lit-protocol-cipher/src/lit-protocol-cipher-provider.ts` that follows the Lit Protocol Documentation should not be modified.
🔇 Additional comments (4)
packages/lit-protocol-cipher/src/lit-protocol-cipher-provider.ts (4)
18-27: LGTM! Improved class naming and documentation.
The rename from LitProvider to LitProtocolCipherProvider better reflects the class's purpose and scope. The updated documentation clearly explains the class's functionality and compatibility.
Line range hint 46-66: LGTM! Constructor improvements implemented as suggested.
The changes implement previous review suggestions:
- Made
litClientnon-nullable - Added type-safe default for the
chainparameter - Simplified constructor signature
Line range hint 114-177: LGTM! Robust session signature implementation.
The implementation includes:
- Proper validation of auth callback parameters
- Secure usage of latest blockhash
- Comprehensive error handling
194-221: LGTM! Well-structured access control conditions implementation.
Excellent improvements:
- Added parameter validation
- Implemented key-based sorting for consistent encryption/decryption
- Created modular condition creation helper
- Added the crypto module to the jest configuration to resolve the ReferenceError: crypto is not defined. - Ensured compatibility with Node.js versions prior to 19 by explicitly setting the global.crypto to webcrypto.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
packages/integration-test/jest.config.js (1)
1-4: Consider version-specific crypto handlingThe implementation correctly addresses the crypto availability issue for Node.js versions before 19. However, we could make this more robust by checking the Node.js version.
Consider this version-aware approach:
// The error ReferenceError: crypto is not defined occurs because the Node.js environment needs the crypto module to be explicitly available. // For Node.js versions before 19, you need to add the crypto global explicitly. -const { webcrypto } = require('crypto'); -global.crypto = webcrypto; +if (process.versions.node.split('.')[0] < '19') { + const { webcrypto } = require('crypto'); + global.crypto = webcrypto; +}
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
packages/integration-test/jest.config.js(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
packages/integration-test/jest.config.js (1)
3-4: Verify Node.js version compatibility
Let's verify the Node.js versions used in the CI environment and development setup to ensure this change is compatible.
✅ Verification successful
Node.js version compatibility is confirmed for webcrypto usage
The change is compatible with the project's Node.js requirements:
- All package.json files specify Node.js
>=18.0.0 - The webcrypto module is available in Node.js 18+ as part of the standard crypto module
- The code includes a helpful comment explaining the explicit crypto global setup for Node.js versions before 19
- This is the only instance of webcrypto usage in the codebase, specifically for test environment setup
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check Node.js version requirements and CI configuration
# Check for Node.js version specifications in package.json
echo "Checking Node.js version requirements in package.json files:"
fd package.json --exec jq -r 'select(.engines != null) | .engines.node' 2>/dev/null
# Check CI configuration for Node.js version
echo -e "\nChecking CI Node.js version:"
fd -g ".circleci/config.yml" --exec grep -A 5 "node:" 2>/dev/null
Length of output: 554
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the availability of webcrypto in Node.js 18
# First, check if there are any existing polyfills or fallbacks
rg -g '!node_modules' -g '!dist' -g '!*.lock' -l "webcrypto|crypto.webcrypto"
# Check for any crypto-related configurations or setup
rg -g '!node_modules' -g '!dist' -g '!*.lock' "global.crypto\s*=" -A 2
# Look for any crypto-related test configurations
fd -g "*jest.config*" --exec cat {} \;
Length of output: 4162
- Updated the test script in package.json to run 'test:lit' before 'test:node' and 'test:layers' for improved test execution flow. - This change aims to enhance the efficiency of the testing process by prioritizing the lit tests. - Fix an old nouce error
Co-authored-by: MantisClone <david.huntmateo@request.network>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
packages/integration-test/test/lit-protocol.test.ts (3)
9-30: Enhance type safety and error handling in waitForConfirmationThe function implementation is correct, but could benefit from some improvements:
Consider applying these enhancements:
-async function waitForConfirmation(request: any, maxAttempts = 10, delayMs = 1000): Promise<void> { +async function waitForConfirmation( + request: Types.IRequestData, + maxAttempts = 10, + delayMs = 1000 +): Promise<void> { let attempts = 0; while (attempts < maxAttempts) { try { const data = await request.getData(); if (data.state === Types.RequestLogic.STATE.CREATED) { console.log(`Request confirmed with state: ${data.state}`); return; } console.log( - `Attempt ${attempts + 1}: Request not confirmed yet. Current state: ${data.state}`, + `Attempt ${attempts + 1}/${maxAttempts}: Request not confirmed yet. Current state: ${data.state}`, ); } catch (error) { - console.log(`Attempt ${attempts + 1} failed:`, error); + console.warn( + `Attempt ${attempts + 1}/${maxAttempts} failed:`, + error instanceof Error ? error.message : String(error) + ); } await sleep(delayMs); attempts++; } - throw new Error(`Request not confirmed after ${maxAttempts} attempts`); + throw new Error( + `Request confirmation timeout: Not confirmed after ${maxAttempts} attempts (${maxAttempts * delayMs}ms)` + ); }
46-77: Add error handling and extract constants in beforeAllThe setup lacks error handling and uses magic numbers.
Consider these improvements:
+const SETUP_TIMEOUT = 30000; +const TEST_CONFIG = { + litNetwork: 'datil-dev', + baseURL: 'http://localhost:3000', +}; -beforeAll(async () => { +beforeAll(async () => { + try { // ... existing setup code ... + } catch (error) { + console.error('Setup failed:', error instanceof Error ? error.message : String(error)); + throw error; + } -}, 30000); +}, SETUP_TIMEOUT);
98-228: Consider adding concurrent operation testsThe test suite would benefit from testing concurrent encryption/decryption operations to ensure thread safety.
Consider adding a test case like this:
it('should handle concurrent operations correctly', async () => { const testData = Array(5).fill('test encryption'); const encryptionParams = [{ key: userWallet.address, method: Types.Encryption.METHOD.KMS, }]; // Perform concurrent encryptions const encrypted = await Promise.all( testData.map(data => litProvider.encrypt(data, { encryptionParams }) ) ); // Perform concurrent decryptions const decrypted = await Promise.all( encrypted.map(data => litProvider.decrypt(data!, { encryptionParams }) ) ); expect(decrypted).toEqual(testData); });
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
packages/integration-test/test/lit-protocol.test.ts(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
packages/integration-test/test/lit-protocol.test.ts (2)
Learnt from: rodrigopavezi
PR: RequestNetwork/requestNetwork#1512
File: packages/integration-test/test/lit-protocol.test.ts:9-31
Timestamp: 2024-12-06T11:27:46.988Z
Learning: In the `waitForConfirmation` function within `packages/integration-test/test/lit-protocol.test.ts`, checking for the request state being `CREATED` or `PENDING` is correct as per design.
Learnt from: rodrigopavezi
PR: RequestNetwork/requestNetwork#1512
File: packages/integration-test/test/lit-protocol.test.ts:208-210
Timestamp: 2024-12-05T23:29:55.043Z
Learning: In integration tests, it's acceptable to mock private methods such as `getLitAccessControlConditions`.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
packages/integration-test/test/lit-protocol.test.ts (4)
9-28: Enhance error handling in waitForConfirmationThe error handling could be more informative for debugging purposes.
Consider this improvement:
async function waitForConfirmation(request: any, maxAttempts = 10, delayMs = 1000): Promise<void> { let attempts = 0; while (attempts < maxAttempts) { try { const data = await request.getData(); if (data.state === Types.RequestLogic.STATE.CREATED) { console.log(`Request confirmed with state: ${data.state}`); return; } console.log( `Attempt ${attempts + 1}: Request not confirmed yet. Current state: ${data.state}`, ); } catch (error) { - console.log(`Attempt ${attempts + 1} failed:`, error); + console.error( + `Attempt ${attempts + 1} failed:`, + error instanceof Error ? error.message : 'Unknown error' + ); } await sleep(delayMs); attempts++; } - throw new Error(`Request not confirmed after ${maxAttempts} attempts`); + throw new Error( + `Request not confirmed after ${maxAttempts} attempts with ${delayMs}ms delay` + ); }
44-75: Enhance setup error handling and validationThe setup phase could benefit from better error handling and validation of initialized components.
Consider these improvements:
beforeAll(async () => { // Create wallet userWallet = new ethers.Wallet( '0x7b595b2bb732edddc4d4fe758ae528c7a748c40f0f6220f4494e214f15c5bfeb', ); + // Validate wallet + if (!userWallet.address) { + throw new Error('Failed to initialize wallet'); + } // Initialize signature provider epkSignatureProvider = new EthereumPrivateKeySignatureProvider({ method: Types.Signature.METHOD.ECDSA, privateKey: userWallet.privateKey, }); // Initialize Lit Protocol client litClient = new LitNodeClient({ litNetwork: 'datil-dev', alertWhenUnauthorized: false, debug: false, }); // Initialize Lit Protocol provider litProvider = new LitProtocolCipherProvider(litClient, nodeConnectionConfig); - await litProvider.initializeClient(); - await litProvider.enableDecryption(true); - await litProvider.getSessionSignatures(userWallet, userWallet.address); + try { + await litProvider.initializeClient(); + await litProvider.enableDecryption(true); + await litProvider.getSessionSignatures(userWallet, userWallet.address); + } catch (error) { + throw new Error( + `Failed to initialize Lit Protocol provider: ${ + error instanceof Error ? error.message : 'Unknown error' + }` + ); + } // Initialize Request Network client requestNetwork = new RequestNetwork({ nodeConnectionConfig, signatureProvider: epkSignatureProvider, cipherProvider: litProvider, }); }, 30000);
77-94: Improve cleanup error handling and validationThe cleanup phase could benefit from better error handling and validation.
Consider these improvements:
afterAll(async () => { try { // Get all pending promises - const promises = []; + const cleanupTasks = []; + const errors = []; if (litProvider) { - promises.push(litProvider.disconnectClient()); - promises.push(litProvider.disconnectWallet()); + cleanupTasks.push( + litProvider.disconnectClient().catch(error => + errors.push(`Failed to disconnect client: ${error.message}`) + ) + ); + cleanupTasks.push( + litProvider.disconnectWallet().catch(error => + errors.push(`Failed to disconnect wallet: ${error.message}`) + ) + ); } if (litClient) { - promises.push(litClient.disconnect()); + cleanupTasks.push( + litClient.disconnect().catch(error => + errors.push(`Failed to disconnect Lit client: ${error.message}`) + ) + ); } // Wait for all cleanup operations to complete - await Promise.all(promises); + await Promise.allSettled(cleanupTasks); + + if (errors.length > 0) { + console.error('Cleanup errors occurred:', errors.join('\n')); + } } catch (error) { - console.error('Cleanup error:', error); + console.error( + 'Fatal cleanup error:', + error instanceof Error ? error.message : 'Unknown error' + ); } });
194-205: Make error handling tests more specificThe encryption error test could be more specific about the expected error message.
Consider this improvement:
it('should handle encryption errors gracefully', async () => { const invalidEncryptionParams = [ { key: '', method: Types.Encryption.METHOD.KMS, }, ]; await expect( litProvider.encrypt('test data', { encryptionParams: invalidEncryptionParams }), - ).rejects.toThrow(/invalid.*key/i); + ).rejects.toThrow( + expect.objectContaining({ + message: expect.stringMatching(/invalid.*key/i), + name: 'ValidationError' // Replace with actual error class name + }) + ); });
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
packages/integration-test/test/lit-protocol.test.ts(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
packages/integration-test/test/lit-protocol.test.ts (3)
Learnt from: rodrigopavezi
PR: RequestNetwork/requestNetwork#1512
File: packages/integration-test/test/lit-protocol.test.ts:48-50
Timestamp: 2024-12-13T10:00:17.504Z
Learning: In `packages/integration-test/test/lit-protocol.test.ts`, the wallet private key `'0x7b595b2bb732edddc4d4fe758ae528c7a748c40f0f6220f4494e214f15c5bfeb'` is fixed and can be hardcoded in the test file.
Learnt from: rodrigopavezi
PR: RequestNetwork/requestNetwork#1512
File: packages/integration-test/test/lit-protocol.test.ts:9-31
Timestamp: 2024-12-06T11:27:46.988Z
Learning: In the `waitForConfirmation` function within `packages/integration-test/test/lit-protocol.test.ts`, checking for the request state being `CREATED` or `PENDING` is correct as per design.
Learnt from: rodrigopavezi
PR: RequestNetwork/requestNetwork#1512
File: packages/integration-test/test/lit-protocol.test.ts:208-210
Timestamp: 2024-12-05T23:29:55.043Z
Learning: In integration tests, it's acceptable to mock private methods such as `getLitAccessControlConditions`.
🔇 Additional comments (1)
packages/integration-test/test/lit-protocol.test.ts (1)
190-192: Track arbitrary timeouts for future improvement
The arbitrary timeouts in the test cases should be improved with proper wait conditions.
Let's create an issue to track this improvement:
#!/bin/bash
# Create an issue to track the timeout improvements
gh issue create \
--title "Refactor: Replace arbitrary timeouts in Lit Protocol integration tests" \
--body "Replace arbitrary timeouts with proper wait conditions in packages/integration-test/test/lit-protocol.test.ts.
Current locations:
- Line 190-192: Wait for pending operations in request creation test
- Line 224-226: Wait for pending operations in decryption error test
Proposed solution:
\`\`\`typescript
async function waitForPendingOperations(timeout = 5000): Promise<void> {
const start = Date.now();
while (Date.now() - start < timeout) {
if (!litProvider.hasPendingOperations()) {
return;
}
await sleep(100);
}
throw new Error('Pending operations timeout');
}
\`\`\`" \
--label "enhancement" \
--label "test"Also applies to: 224-226
packages/lit-protocol-cipher/src/lit-protocol-cipher-provider.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (8)
packages/ethereum-storage/test/ipfs-manager.test.ts (1)
Line range hint
89-94: Consider adding test coverage for partial success scenariosWhile the error handling tests cover complete failure scenarios, consider adding test cases for partial success scenarios where some operations succeed after retries.
packages/integration-test/test/lit-protocol.test.ts (3)
7-29: Consider improving the waitForConfirmation functionThe function could be enhanced in several ways:
- Add type safety by replacing
anywith a proper type for the request parameter- Consider using exponential backoff instead of fixed delays
- Add JSDoc documentation for better maintainability
-async function waitForConfirmation(request: any, maxAttempts = 10, delayMs = 1000): Promise<void> { +/** + * Waits for a request to be confirmed by checking its state + * @param request - The request object to check + * @param maxAttempts - Maximum number of retry attempts + * @param initialDelayMs - Initial delay between attempts (doubles with each retry) + */ +async function waitForConfirmation( + request: Types.IRequestData, + maxAttempts = 10, + initialDelayMs = 1000 +): Promise<void> { let attempts = 0; while (attempts < maxAttempts) { try { const data = await request.getData(); if (data.state === Types.RequestLogic.STATE.CREATED) { console.log(`Request confirmed with state: ${data.state}`); return; } console.log( `Attempt ${attempts + 1}: Request not confirmed yet. Current state: ${data.state}`, ); } catch (error) { console.log(`Attempt ${attempts + 1} failed:`, error); } - await sleep(delayMs); + await sleep(initialDelayMs * Math.pow(2, attempts)); attempts++; } throw new Error(`Request not confirmed after ${maxAttempts} attempts`); }
38-43: Consider extracting test configurationThe node connection configuration could be moved to a separate test configuration file to improve maintainability and reusability across tests.
190-201: Consider adding more error test casesWhile the basic error handling test is good, consider adding more test cases for different error scenarios:
- Invalid method
- Missing encryption parameters
- Network errors
packages/lit-protocol-cipher/test/index.test.ts (1)
102-147: Consider adding edge cases to state management testsWhile the state management tests are thorough, consider adding tests for:
- Race conditions during state changes
- State persistence across operations
- Recovery from invalid states
packages/lit-protocol-cipher/src/lit-protocol-cipher-provider.ts (3)
75-79: Consider enhancing error handling in initializeClient.While the error handling is good, consider preserving the original error stack trace:
try { await this.litClient?.connect(); } catch (error) { - throw new Error(`Failed to initialize Lit client: ${error.message}`); + throw new Error(`Failed to initialize Lit client: ${error.message}`, { cause: error }); }
194-201: Consider enhancing parameter validation.While the key validation is good, consider also validating other required fields:
encryptionParams.forEach((param, index) => { if (!param.key) throw new Error(`Invalid encryption parameter at index ${index}: missing key`); + if (typeof param.key !== 'string') + throw new Error(`Invalid encryption parameter at index ${index}: key must be a string`); });
Line range hint
266-280: Consider enhancing error handling in encrypt/decrypt methods.While the implementation is correct, consider adding more specific error handling:
public async encrypt( data: string | { [key: string]: any }, options: { encryptionParams: EncryptionTypes.IEncryptionParameters[]; }, ): Promise<EncryptResponse | null> { if (!this.litClient) { throw new Error('Lit client not initialized'); } + try { const stringifiedData = typeof data === 'string' ? data : JSON.stringify(data); const accessControlConditions = await this.getLitAccessControlConditions( options.encryptionParams, ); return await this.litClient.encrypt({ accessControlConditions: accessControlConditions, dataToEncrypt: new TextEncoder().encode(stringifiedData), }); + } catch (error) { + throw new Error(`Encryption failed: ${error.message}`, { cause: error }); + } }Also applies to: 308-329
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
packages/ethereum-storage/test/ipfs-manager.test.ts(1 hunks)packages/integration-test/test/lit-protocol.test.ts(1 hunks)packages/lit-protocol-cipher/src/lit-protocol-cipher-provider.ts(16 hunks)packages/lit-protocol-cipher/test/index.test.ts(6 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (2)
packages/lit-protocol-cipher/src/lit-protocol-cipher-provider.ts (1)
Learnt from: rodrigopavezi
PR: RequestNetwork/requestNetwork#1475
File: packages/lit-protocol-cipher/src/lit-protocol-cipher-provider.ts:124-153
Timestamp: 2024-11-21T08:59:19.774Z
Learning: The code in `packages/lit-protocol-cipher/src/lit-protocol-cipher-provider.ts` that follows the Lit Protocol Documentation should not be modified.
packages/integration-test/test/lit-protocol.test.ts (3)
Learnt from: rodrigopavezi
PR: RequestNetwork/requestNetwork#1512
File: packages/integration-test/test/lit-protocol.test.ts:48-50
Timestamp: 2024-12-13T10:00:17.504Z
Learning: In `packages/integration-test/test/lit-protocol.test.ts`, the wallet private key `'0x7b595b2bb732edddc4d4fe758ae528c7a748c40f0f6220f4494e214f15c5bfeb'` is fixed and can be hardcoded in the test file.
Learnt from: rodrigopavezi
PR: RequestNetwork/requestNetwork#1512
File: packages/integration-test/test/lit-protocol.test.ts:9-31
Timestamp: 2024-12-06T11:27:46.988Z
Learning: In the `waitForConfirmation` function within `packages/integration-test/test/lit-protocol.test.ts`, checking for the request state being `CREATED` or `PENDING` is correct as per design.
Learnt from: rodrigopavezi
PR: RequestNetwork/requestNetwork#1512
File: packages/integration-test/test/lit-protocol.test.ts:208-210
Timestamp: 2024-12-05T23:29:55.043Z
Learning: In integration tests, it's acceptable to mock private methods such as `getLitAccessControlConditions`.
🔇 Additional comments (9)
packages/ethereum-storage/test/ipfs-manager.test.ts (1)
Line range hint 6-14: LGTM: Well-structured error handling configuration
The error handling configurations are well-defined with clear separation between no-retry and retry scenarios. The Jest timeout of 30 seconds is reasonable for IPFS operations.
packages/integration-test/test/lit-protocol.test.ts (1)
78-95: LGTM: Thorough cleanup in afterAll
The cleanup process is well-structured with proper error handling and parallel cleanup operations.
packages/lit-protocol-cipher/test/index.test.ts (2)
43-53: LGTM: Well-structured mock responses
The mock responses for encrypt and decrypt operations are well-structured and match the expected formats.
225-230: LGTM: Proper error handling test
Good test coverage for the uninitialized client scenario with clear error message expectation.
packages/lit-protocol-cipher/src/lit-protocol-cipher-provider.ts (5)
18-27: LGTM! Class renaming and imports are well-structured.
The rename to LitProtocolCipherProvider better reflects the class's purpose and responsibility. Documentation is comprehensive and follows JSDoc standards.
46-46: Property litClient is now non-nullable as previously suggested.
This change improves type safety by ensuring litClient is always defined.
59-65: LGTM! Constructor is now more type-safe and simpler.
The constructor properly initializes all required properties and includes a sensible default for the optional chain parameter.
Line range hint 115-177: LGTM! Session handling follows Lit Protocol Documentation.
The implementation includes proper error checking and follows the recommended patterns for session signature generation.
Line range hint 222-247: LGTM! Decryption control methods are clear and precise.
The boolean flags and availability checks are well-implemented.
Description of the changes
Fixes #1513
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
testscript to includetest:litfor executing specific tests.start:request-nodescript to set the environment variable for the request node.Bug Fixes
Documentation
Chores