feat: add build workflow to ci #239
Conversation
WalkthroughA new GitHub Actions workflow file named Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/build.yml (1)
1-6: Consider including draft PRs in the trigger events.While the current triggers cover the main PR events, including draft PRs (
draft) in the types list would allow developers to get early feedback on build issues before marking the PR as ready for review.pull_request: - types: [opened, reopened, synchronize, ready_for_review] + types: [opened, reopened, synchronize, ready_for_review, draft]
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/build.yml(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
.github/workflows/build.yml (3)
8-10: LGTM! Efficient concurrency configuration.
The concurrency settings are well-configured to prevent queue buildup and ensure resources are used efficiently by canceling outdated builds.
12-24: Verify Node.js version and enhance caching configuration.
The setup looks good, but consider:
- Verify that Node.js 18 matches the project's requirements
- Add cache configuration for better build performance
Let's verify the Node.js version requirement:
Consider enhancing the cache configuration:
with:
node-version: '18'
cache: 'npm'
+ cache-dependency-path: '**/package-lock.json'✅ Verification successful
Node.js 18 is appropriate and cache configuration is sufficient
Based on the analysis of package.json files and TypeScript usage:
- The project uses modern TypeScript and ES modules, which are well-supported in Node.js 18
- Dependencies like Vite v4, SvelteKit, and modern React are all compatible with Node.js 18
- The current npm cache configuration is adequate as the project follows standard npm structure with a root package-lock.json
The original review suggestion for cache improvements isn't necessary as the default npm caching strategy is optimal for this monorepo structure.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check package.json for Node.js version requirements
fd package.json --exec cat {} | jq -r '.engines.node'
Length of output: 100
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual Node.js dependencies and usage patterns
# First, check if there's any Node.js version specified in package.json
fd package.json --exec cat {} | jq '.'
# Then, let's look for any Node.js specific features or syntax
# that might indicate version requirements
rg -l "(?:async|await|??=|import\s+.*\s+from|export\s+default)" --type js
# Also check for any TypeScript usage which might indicate modern Node.js requirements
fd "\.ts$|tsconfig\.json"
Length of output: 13093
1-29: Consider workflow integration aspects.
While this workflow successfully prevents build errors, consider these architectural points:
- Make this workflow a required check for PR merging
- Ensure it runs before other workflows that might depend on build artifacts
- Consider integrating with existing test workflows to optimize CI time
Let's check for other workflows that might need coordination:
Problem
The CI doesn't run the build, thus risking build errors getting merged to
mainSolution
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Chores