Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test the visual Urdf elements #138

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 15, 2014

Conversation

T045T
Copy link
Contributor

@T045T T045T commented Nov 15, 2014

added a test to ensure visual URDF elements are parsed correctly. This passed both before and after merging #137

Todo: test some less friendly cases

@megawac
Copy link
Contributor

megawac commented Nov 15, 2014

+100 love me some tests

@T045T
Copy link
Contributor Author

T045T commented Nov 15, 2014

On a related note: I don't see any error handling in the URDF code - should we validate the URDF before (or during) parsing it and at least warn the user something might be off?

@rctoris
Copy link
Contributor

rctoris commented Nov 15, 2014

We could, but I always saw it as effort into something that will rarely happen. Since we are assuming a ROS connection for the URDF in most cases, ROS won't actually load an invalid URDF.

rctoris added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 15, 2014
@rctoris rctoris merged commit 6c6ba80 into RobotWebTools:develop Nov 15, 2014
jihoonl pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 29, 2017
k-aguete pushed a commit to k-aguete/roslibjs that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants